bullet chess is bad!!

Sort:
HRIsAfraidOfMe

#1 Yeah, but in 5-min and + games, there’s a ton of indian cheating going on

Magnus_Carlsen08764
sndeww wrote:

bullet chess is bad. You are hardly given any time to think, you are just playing cookie clicker with extra steps. Why play chess at that point? Just go google "kung fu chess" and play that instead, it's much more fun, because it's just better bullet. In bullet you're still confined to the turn based system of the game, which beats the inherent intention of bullet chess, which is to outwit your opponent through quick movements. Yet you are still limited to how fast the opponent moves, so you get the worst of both worlds. the best part about bullet is that if you need to go pipi in your pampers you can finish the game faster, but in a slower game you can just go without needing to finish. There is no reason to play bullet, it is too fast and at the same time, too slow. Instead, if you want a game with actual thinking involved, you should play 3 minute blitz.

says the one with a 2500 bullet rating and a 2300 rapid

glovkye
sndeww wrote:

bullet chess is bad. You are hardly given any time to think, you are just playing cookie clicker with extra steps. Why play chess at that point? Just go google "kung fu chess" and play that instead, it's much more fun, because it's just better bullet. In bullet you're still confined to the turn based system of the game, which beats the inherent intention of bullet chess, which is to outwit your opponent through quick movements. Yet you are still limited to how fast the opponent moves, so you get the worst of both worlds. the best part about bullet is that if you need to go pipi in your pampers you can finish the game faster, but in a slower game you can just go without needing to finish. There is no reason to play bullet, it is too fast and at the same time, too slow. Instead, if you want a game with actual thinking involved, you should play 3 minute blitz.

True