i think that could be online games
Blunders, (if cancelled can save many games)
Sort:
Ahmad_fuad wrote:
i think that could be online games
thanks for the comment, what do you mean?
trysts wrote:
17,459,346 games.
Wow, that's incredible, you're probably a blitz player to have played that many games!
If all blunders were erased, all the games would end up drawn.
dawgface420 wrote:
If all blunders were erased, all the games would end up drawn.
That's an incorrect statement! A blunder is a silly mistake, such as letting your queen be taken for free. A mistake could be anywhere from a slight positional imperfection to a silly blunder. Blunders can always be fixed, easily, and yet they still happen. Computers never blunder, but they can have a less powerful strategy. Computers can make positional mistakes, but they don't blunder. Thanks for the comment though, and I highly enjoy unique opinions and comments. (Tip: Look up blunder on the chessopedia, chess-encyclopedia on chess.com, you may have to be a premium member to do this though.)
whats the point in asking someones opinion and just arguing with them?
do you REALLY need to feel that superior?
APStevens wrote:
whats the point in asking someones opinion and just arguing with them?
do you REALLY need to feel that superior?
whats the point in coming into a thread and bashing someone's opinion?
do you REALLY need to feel that superior?
In all seriousness, how is he arguing? I see it as more debating that arguing.
See it as you will, it is what it is, isn't it?
This entire thread is nothing but slight of the word. Let's see who can twist around sentences with unneeded adjectives, right?
Aug 2, 2010
0
#11
APS, quit being a troll. You know damn well the difference between a blunder and a mistake or an inaccuracy. And if you don't, you have no business in this thread anyway.
APStevens wrote:
whats the point in asking someones opinion and just arguing with them?
do you REALLY need to feel that superior?
I'm not arguing with them, I'm replying
APStevens wrote:
whats the point in asking someones opinion and just arguing with them?
do you REALLY need to feel that superior?
It's debating, and please be nice, I'm trying to be nice to everybody, I even said thank you for your opinion and I really enjoy it, you didn't read the whole thing, and if you did, then please don't bash out FACTS!!! Hello? It wasn't bashing out opinions, it was kindly stating that a blunder is different, I was nice to him, and I'm thankful he commented, however, your statement is NOT appreciated
APStevens wrote:
See it as you will, it is what it is, isn't it?
This entire thread is nothing but slight of the word. Let's see who can twist around sentences with unneeded adjectives, right?
If you're not going to talk about chess, and only say random words, please refrain from commenting. Not one thing you said had to do with chess, and it wasn't right anyways. You only talked about arguing and grammar, is that chess?
ZporeSuperMaster wrote:
APStevens wrote:
See it as you will, it is what it is, isn't it?
This entire thread is nothing but slight of the word. Let's see who can twist around sentences with unneeded adjectives, right?
If you're not going to talk about chess, and only say random words, please refrain from commenting. Not one thing you said had to do with chess, and it wasn't right anyways. You only talked about arguing and grammar, is that chess?
Maybe if you asked a better question, you would get better responses.
MyCowsCanFly wrote:
ZporeSuperMaster wrote:
APStevens wrote:
See it as you will, it is what it is, isn't it?
This entire thread is nothing but slight of the word. Let's see who can twist around sentences with unneeded adjectives, right?
If you're not going to talk about chess, and only say random words, please refrain from commenting. Not one thing you said had to do with chess, and it wasn't right anyways. You only talked about arguing and grammar, is that chess?
Maybe if you asked a better question, you would get better responses.
I do get good responses, (besides yours), because it is a great question. You're just angry, AND, you're not even talking about chess for the third time! I soon will start blocking your account. Thank you for your attempt to politely comment, it is greatly appreciated.
ZporeSuperMaster wrote:
MyCowsCanFly wrote:
ZporeSuperMaster wrote:
APStevens wrote:
See it as you will, it is what it is, isn't it?
This entire thread is nothing but slight of the word. Let's see who can twist around sentences with unneeded adjectives, right?
If you're not going to talk about chess, and only say random words, please refrain from commenting. Not one thing you said had to do with chess, and it wasn't right anyways. You only talked about arguing and grammar, is that chess?
Maybe if you asked a better question, you would get better responses.
I do get good responses, (besides yours), because it is a great question. You're just angry, AND, you're not even talking about chess for the third time! I soon will start blocking your account. Thank you for your attempt to politely comment, it is greatly appreciated.
I guess you are confusing respondents.
trysts wrote:
17,459,346 games.
This is a too subtle a way of pointing out the problem with your question.
MyCowsCanFly wrote:
ZporeSuperMaster wrote:
MyCowsCanFly wrote:
ZporeSuperMaster wrote:
APStevens wrote:
See it as you will, it is what it is, isn't it?
This entire thread is nothing but slight of the word. Let's see who can twist around sentences with unneeded adjectives, right?
If you're not going to talk about chess, and only say random words, please refrain from commenting. Not one thing you said had to do with chess, and it wasn't right anyways. You only talked about arguing and grammar, is that chess?
Maybe if you asked a better question, you would get better responses.
I do get good responses, (besides yours), because it is a great question. You're just angry, AND, you're not even talking about chess for the third time! I soon will start blocking your account. Thank you for your attempt to politely comment, it is greatly appreciated.
I guess you are confusing respondents.
no
Hello smart chess.com members, (including non-paying members), I was just wondering how many games could have been saved, if blunders could be erased: