Blunders, (if cancelled can save many games)

Sort:
ZporeSuperMaster
MyCowsCanFly wrote:

I'm sure everyone else can count the number of replies I made. In any event, good luck with your question.


What exactly is your point, PLEASE do not comment if you're not going to talk about chess, or I can report your comments to chess.com staff

Hyannis

Arguements put to one side, surely blunders cannot ne erased from a game that has already been played and you analyse the game to see where, if anything, you went wrong and how the computer shows you alternative moves that you could have played to play like a GM!!! Because how would you know you have made a blunder without this aide?

However, this sustem is flawed. I played a game recently, where I took 10 moves to make my opponent resign. When I analysed the game it showed that I made one mistake, no inaccuracies and no blunders. When analysing the moves and how the game progressed, I noticed that the move that I made and was flagged as a mistake, was also played by the computer. So how can it be a mistake?

ZporeSuperMaster
Hyannis wrote:

Arguements put to one side, surely blunders cannot ne erased from a game that has already been played and you analyse the game to see where, if anything, you went wrong and how the computer shows you alternative moves that you could have played to play like a GM!!! Because how would you know you have made a blunder without this aide?

However, this sustem is flawed. I played a game recently, where I took 10 moves to make my opponent resign. When I analysed the game it showed that I made one mistake, no inaccuracies and no blunders. When analysing the moves and how the game progressed, I noticed that the move that I made and was flagged as a mistake, was also played by the computer. So how can it be a mistake?


Thank you for the comment, you actually talked about chess!  That was the most intelligent comment I've seen on this forum, and I am happy to respond.  On computer analyzing (I'm a premium member and know a lot about computer analyzing), mistakes, inaccuracies, and blunders are all categorized differently.  Even though they are all mistakes, the "mistake" category on computer analysis is even a specific positional imperfection within the category of the definition "chess mistake", (slightly different than inaccuracies).  Check the chessopedia!  Great Comment, I learned from it!

aquiredtaste

What exactly is your point, PLEASE do not comment if you're not going to talk about chess, or I can report your comments to chess.com staff


ROFL!  MyCows, I asked him if he was sparenone's brother in another thread.  You can assume his response.

To comply with the OP's wishes: "Chess is awesome."  You can even quote me!

ZporeSuperMaster
aquiredtaste wrote:

What exactly is your point, PLEASE do not comment if you're not going to talk about chess, or I can report your comments to chess.com staff


ROFL!  MyCows, I asked him if he was sparenone's brother in another thread.  You can assume his response.

To comply with the OP's wishes: "Chess is awesome."  You can even quote me!


ok, cool yo

APStevens

i understand the difference between blunders and mistakes or even inaccuracies.

in my honest opinion, just about every game from 1000 down is blundersome. when first earning chess, isn't that the type of thng one looks to improve first?

 Better?

and my previous post were about chess- the were about the chess players and how I saw what they were posting. despite me being wrong or not, it's still about chess in an inderect way.

ringwraith10

it can save the last two i played against some 1370 and get me back 20 points.... i hate myself