Why?
Boris Give Advice

Why?
There are many reasons but I will not give them to you. If you must ask you are not advanced enough in deep chess philosophy to understand answers.

But even after they take your queen you still a chance of winning and if not that you could draw, it makes no chance unless it's forced mate or you have other duties to preform

If you are below 1000 elo and are resigning after losing your queen, you are making climbing the elo ladder more difficult on yourself. People in this elo range blunder left and right, and many do not know how to play endgames correctly. Force your opponent to prove they know what they are doing. If you and your opponent were advanced players, you would respect their abilities and resign. But you are not advanced. Play on.

Why?
There are many reasons but I will not give them to you. If you must ask you are not advanced enough in deep chess philosophy to understand answers.
LOL.

But even after they take your queen you still a chance of winning and if not that you could draw, it makes no chance unless it's forced mate or you have other duties to preform
It is not the way men play chess. Real mean who eat blood sausage.

If you are below 1000 elo and are resigning after losing your queen, you are making climbing the elo ladder more difficult on yourself. People in this elo range blunder left and right, and many do not know how to play endgames correctly. Force your opponent to prove they know what they are doing. If you and your opponent were advanced players, you would respect their abilities and resign. But you are not advanced. Play on.
I have right to make observation and comment. I cannot express my true feeling because pesky moderator has no sense of humor or appreciation of witty sarcasm and he stalk Boris. I can tell you this, Boris is good chess player. Good enough. Does not matter what online chess.com blitzy witzy bullet rapid fake elo says. You set with Boris over chess board and he play you good game. If Boris lose Queen after four moves he will resign, and go back home and stick hand into bag of Brazilian bullet ants. This opponent only understand chess from only play blitz and rapid chess on mobile phone all his life. I bet he, and you too, do not even own real chess board. Tell me no the lies, do you own real chess board? Real one, not one with Star War pieces.

But even after they take your queen you still a chance of winning and if not that you could draw, it makes no chance unless it's forced mate or you have other duties to preform
It is not the way men play chess. Real mean who eat blood sausage.
If you say so

If I find that I can't win, like when my opponent captures my Queen, no way am I wanting to keep playing in hopes of getting a stalemate. If I can't win, I congratulate you and move on.

If Boris lose Queen after four moves he will resign, and go back home and stick hand into bag of Brazilian bullet ants.
LOL

If you are below 1000 elo and are resigning after losing your queen, you are making climbing the elo ladder more difficult on yourself. People in this elo range blunder left and right, and many do not know how to play endgames correctly. Force your opponent to prove they know what they are doing. If you and your opponent were advanced players, you would respect their abilities and resign. But you are not advanced. Play on.
I have right to make observation and comment. I cannot express my true feeling because pesky moderator has no sense of humor or appreciation of witty sarcasm and he stalk Boris. I can tell you this, Boris is good chess player. Good enough. Does not matter what online chess.com blitzy witzy bullet rapid fake elo says. You set with Boris over chess board and he play you good game. If Boris lose Queen after four moves he will resign, and go back home and stick hand into bag of Brazilian bullet ants. This opponent only understand chess from only play blitz and rapid chess on mobile phone all his life. I bet he, and you too, do not even own real chess board. Tell me no the lies, do you own real chess board? Real one, not one with Star War pieces.
The mods just need to get used to you. I don't dislike any of them so I don't think they're hopeless. Might take you being patient with them, not for too long I hope. Some players here might want to avoid you, sure, and I won't vouch for them... just like Saturday Night Live when it was still worth watching, or Monty Python, if you know them, was never everyone's cup of tea.

If I find that I can't win, like when my opponent captures my Queen, no way am I wanting to keep playing in hopes of getting a stalemate. If I can't win, I congratulate you and move on.
Remember the TV show The Queen's Gambit? The janitor tries to teach her that. She is resistant and stubborn at first, but later in the series she realizes he was right. Not in all cases does one need to resign. One can lose a Queen and still be up in material and position, and it is nearing the endgame. But if I lost my Queen right off, I would consider it an unredeemable error and I would not even want to win the game any longer. Now people play fast chess and consider just winning by the clock alone a victory. Very unlikely to achieve an eventual stalemate after only four moves into the game. And another problem is the guy goes on to give away more and material, right and left.

.
I guess this okay with the mods but calling somebody a noob is not. Okay.

But even after they take your queen you still a chance of winning and if not that you could draw, it makes no chance unless it's forced mate or you have other duties to preform
It is not the way men play chess. Real mean who eat blood sausage.
Real men... coarse, hairy, knuckle-dragging brutes... do not need a Queen. A row of Pawns is more than enough. But real men don't blunder their Queen away. They sacrifice it. On purpose.

I agree. It's about just being a good sport sometimes. It can show good spirit to fight on against all odds. But too often it just seems small minded. I play to win but it doesn't ring my bell to get outplayed then get a draw by stalemate or a win by the clock. About losing a Queen on the fourth move, it's also just the frustration, as you say, so I would just quit and not make it worse.
The Queen's Gambit was great. I'm going to watch it again sometime.

Real men... coarse, hairy, knuckle-dragging brutes... do not need a Queen. A row of Pawns is more than enough. But real men don't blunder their Queen away. They sacrifice it. On purpose.
Ah, I see you know how to play manly chess.

The ONLY BEST MOVE AFTER LOSING YOUR QUEEN IS... RESIGNING BECAUSE SOME PEOPLE say that you have a chance we'll that's for beginners not for advanced

If you lose Queen on move 4, resign like real man.
I grind his meat to blood sausage.
Most of my losses are by resigning. When it's my opponent, it can be annoying but it's okay if he wants to play to the bitter end. And I know a lot of coaches teach their students exactly that. It's fine.
If you lose Queen on move 4, resign like real man.
I grind his meat to blood sausage.