another historic moment from chess cheating past brought to you by THE CHEAT STORE. remember our motto, "cheating is nothing new, but we can add something new to your cheating." Now, for the scene: we go back to the very early days of the game. player A "raja please, will you have your pet bengal, "kittypuss", take her paws off my chest, i cant see the board" player B "where were you about to move your elephant piece?" do come down to your neighborhood CHEAT STORE and browse through our large selection. we are sure you will find something to add to your cheating stategy. thankyou for your time and attention, you will not be disapointed.
Borislav Ivanov is BACK!
Sort:
newcastlesmoof wrote:
The Wikipedia article on Tiger Lilov got deleted last night. Out.
Indyfilmguy wrote:
I can almost guarantee that the article on Lilov will be deleted, and the article on Ivanov kept. There's been a lot of coverage of Ivanov in the legitimate media that would support him having an article on Wikipedia.
That would mean some kind of "He who laughs last, laughs best" for you?
Because in the end, Ivanov will just dissapear from chess playing and Lilov is an IM.>
Indyfilmguy equals newcaslesmoof
got a new alias I see. Duly reported. "Citizen patrol" on the case.
newcastlesmoof wrote:
More like, he who laughs first, gets blocked from Wikipedia. I mean, what do you need to do to get blocked from Wikipedia, man? You must be a very, very bad boy!
yup, you're confirming it. Just keep writing. Indyfilmguy is back everyone.
newcastlesmoof/Indyfilmguy/Umberto_Unity/Thomas_Hauser and prob a few others) just had his account closed for multiple accounts.
Oct 24, 2013
0
#586
a news flash from nashville tennessee brought to you by "chess cheating past" i am sitting overlooking the cumberland river here in "music city" reading the local "north gallitan street shopping gazette" and on the 14th page an article caught my eye...it appears that country singer Hank Williams wrote his hit song "your cheating heart" not after disappointment in a relationship, but rather due to a loss in a chess game he believes was played unfairly. however, record industry producers, feeling that sales would suffer from lack of sympathy for a "chess loss", changed the song into one aimed at an audience that would be more deeply affected by trouble in a relationship than a chess game go figure? oh well ...i thought that someone else might be interested
fiddletim wrote:
oh well ...i thought that someone else might be interested
Um, well, uh....
Oct 25, 2013
0
#588
ok ill get more to the point....Hank Williams, from the song "your cheating heart"...."your cheating heart will tell on you...you'll walk the floor the whole night thru...but sleep won't come im, telling you...your cheating heart will tell on you."
maxwellaue wrote:
Whats up with this stuff with Valeri Lilov?
What's up with your pathetic hobby? I mean you're not even good at it.
(I only feel like giving you one response per user name, so I'll just edit this post to say so instead of making a new one.)
I think the hobby is sockpuppetry which is a seriously pathetic hobby but I can see how you have been driven to it.
zombomanero wrote:
chiaroscuro62 wrote:
I think the hobby is sockpuppetry which is a seriously pathetic hobby but I can see how you have been driven to it.
What do you mean? How was he driven to it?
At least the sock master has some humour.
Seriously, "zombomanero" just registered and the first thing he does is commenting here...
waffllemaster wrote:
maxwellaue wrote:
Whats up with this stuff with Valeri Lilov?
What's up with your pathetic hobby? I mean you're not even good at it.
(I only feel like giving you one response per user name, so I'll just edit this post to say so instead of making a new one.)
haha, good catch waffle and iron. maxwellaue, joined chess.com oct 24, 2013. the cat came back, just couldn't stay away. haha and zombamanero, haha, pathetic hobby hahaha
found this in chessbase website from his interview by Maria Grigoryan:
Did the arbiter take your clothes off, or did they just check your pockets?
Well, I know my body is handsome and beautiful, but I didn't find it enough to show them the real sexual affection I have for other people around me, so I just said no, although they checked my pockets very slowly and my jacket and after they found nothing.... well, may be they were a bit disappointed, cause they were 100% sure I was cheating and of course that's a total lie.
thats the way to answer it.WTF! lol
Oct 26, 2013
0
#595
Yekatrinas wrote:
Jaas and others have nothing to say about math and science and little about chess. That's why they exaggerate the orthographical mistakes I made. The question whether or not to capitalize words like math and physics, to put a whitespace in front of an exclamation mark, and to write few times loose instead of lose, is nothing more than pedentry and has not to do with low English skills.
These are choices to be certain, but as choices they fit in the general category called ERRORS.
Of course, English skills or lack thereof are not the sole cause. Others include laziness, improper calibration of auto-correct, drunkenness, and even giving priority to substance over presentation.
Those who favor presentation over substance display a certain anality. In an ideal world, both work in tandem. In the actual world, both are usually absent. Those with skills in either should not be condemned.
Has anybody posted a youtube video crying and screaming to "leave boris Ivanov alone" yet?
Oct 26, 2013
0
#597
Yekatrinas wrote:
Why don't you take a side, but stay vague, Ziryab ? Don't you see that I was valued as a debator HERE only by dismantling the ill intent ? That this is the job of those who are NOT attacked, but the required help did not come, or too late ?
I'm on the side of grammar, but as servant to the truth rather than its substitute.
Oct 27, 2013
0
#598
Ok, Yekatrinas, I will try to attack you on arguments, not on your person as you requested. :-)
In your first sentence you start without a capital. That is a grammatical mistake in English. In your second sentence do you use two commas, but none of them is imho an example of proper use of a comma.
The first should preferrably be replaced by a double colon (at least in Dutch).
The second one should preferrably not be used at all, because or not is a intrinsic part of the sentence starting with 'are you..'.
Two sentences, three grammatical mistakes. :-)
As far as I understand Ziryab, is that truth is not on your side, nor on anyone elses side. Grammar is important, but should not be used as an argument to prove or disprove the truthfullness of any statement.
We all make grammatical mistakes from time to time. Although grammatical knowledge and mathematics are correlated to each other, I have never perceived making grammatical mistakes as a serious counterargument for anything. Certainly not for someone used to speak in a language of another family of languages.
I gave other students and fellow pupils extra lessons in mathematics and physics on college and on university and always used their grammatical skills as a proof of their capacity to apply complicated formulas and made use of examples like crossing the street in the evening while it is raining of their capacity to make calculations that were more complicated then required in the tests.
God's truth, must this woman always get in the last word?
Go make your own goddman topic where you can impress your fanclub with you grammar and math skills. Most of us don't care, we only care about your bad manners derailing threads which we have been following.
Oct 27, 2013
0
#600
Preferably? Lol. It is a mistake, but not a grammatical one. :-)
Uh, in post #702 you said that no one has ever shown you mistakes you have made in your English grammar. Since I did not had any counter arguments on your other posts, I had to make use of those 'mistakes'. So, it is in a way an attack on the content of one of your statements. I had not other argument to counter. You might give me one and give me a real try.
Serving the trolls? No, I don't do that. If people use any argument from someone else, then is it still their responsibility how to use it. Like Ziryab is pointing out: a grammatical mistake is only a grammatical mistake.
If there are not too many grammatical mistakes that the text is still readable, then do I not mind any of them. It is about the content, not about the context. In many situations is the medium not the message and as long as the message is clearly understood is there no problem at all.
You definitely made my sentence better (more?) readable.
I wonder if the second sentence of you was correct. Maybe should an expert shed some light on it. We are both writing in a foreign language. I would prefer:
You can decide: are you on my side or not?
What means 'lyvho'?
yes. I was duped. I hope I've learned my lesson. Indy is gone. But he'll def be back with a new name.