Bruh

Sort:
OP_Chessist

Ain't no way it called me predicting the opponent's move an inaccuracy 

0_0

OP_Chessist

On the complete opposite end of the scale, it's ELO prediction was not far off my irl rating

My irl rating is between 1000 and 1300 so it actually was accurate this time lol

Martin_Stahl
OP_Chessist wrote:

Ain't no way it called me predicting the opponent's move an inaccuracy

0_0

A change in evaluation has no bearing on possible mistakes your opponent might make. So if the evaluation change is enough to trigger an inaccuracy, it doesn't matter what your opponent's reply is happy

OP_Chessist
Martin_Stahl wrote:
OP_Chessist wrote:

Ain't no way it called me predicting the opponent's move an inaccuracy

0_0

A change in evaluation has no bearing on possible mistakes your opponent might make. So if the evaluation change is enough to trigger an inaccuracy, it doesn't matter what your opponent's reply is

Thanks for explaining

Props to you for being a good moderator happy.png

LJST83
You want to hear bruh? I played consistently for a two years, got up to 700+ rating… now at 381 I’m constantly losing to sandbaggers. I’m not sure what happened to chess.com but there is definitely an extreme issue with sandbaggers that has really warped the ratings of this game. Period bruh