bullet chess is bad!!
Sort:
a lot of people like to hate on bullet and speed chess in general, but speed chess isn’t about improving your calculation skills. It’s just about having fun and playing really fast chess with other people
Nov 17, 2023
0
#22
Regalbeginning wrote:
Yet you also play it. This is just blasphemy nothing else.
bro rly fell for a b1z troll thread
Nov 17, 2023
0
#24
Regalbeginning wrote:
Yet you also play it. This is just blasphemy nothing else.
Not bad but trash
6 hrs ago
0
#27
Jabb3rwocky wrote:
you are the wors tp erson in the whole univrse!!! you suck and i will punch you in the basllls
please dont. I am very afraid of someone on the internet punching my (Virtual) balls. Oh wait, do I even have them? Hmm... Thank goodness. Nobody stole mine. But please don't! It will hurt....
6 hrs ago
0
#28
Jabb3rwocky wrote:
sndeww wrote:
Jabb3rwocky wrote:
you are the wors tp erson in the whole univrse!!! you suck and i will punch you in the basllls
please dont. I am very afraid of someone on the internet punching my (Virtual) balls. Oh wait, do I even have them? Hmm... Thank goodness. Nobody stole mine. But please don't! It will hurt....
Im sorry I didnt mean what I said
im trolling dude i dont care. if i got upset at what you said I would turn off the computer.
6 hrs ago
0
#29
Jabb3rwocky wrote:
i didnt mean what I said that was bob the voice in the back of my head..
bob is very mean and should feel bad
6 hrs ago
0
#30
alphaous wrote:
Jabb3rwocky wrote:
i didnt mean what I said that was bob the voice in the back of my head..
bob is very mean and should feel bad
freakbob called him
6 hrs ago
0
#31
sndeww wrote:
alphaous wrote:
Jabb3rwocky wrote:
i didnt mean what I said that was bob the voice in the back of my head..
bob is very mean and should feel bad
freakbob called him
imagine not teaming up with the voice in the back of your head to be more effectively devious instead of being halfheartedly mean
6 hrs ago
0
#32
im like 10 years too old to be upset over "I will punch your balls" (incredibly inefficient, you should use your knee) and before then, I would have been too stupid to know what it meant
6 hrs ago
0
#33
sndeww wrote:
im like 10 years too old to be upset over "I will punch your balls" (incredibly inefficient, you should use your knee) and before then, I would have been too stupid to know what it meant
he should have threatened to sell them, that would have been a scary and practical threat
Ironically he apparently doesn't have the balls to steal yours, but if he did then he wouldn't need to steal yours at all (unless he had a buyer)
fascinating paradox
5 hrs ago
0
#35
#1 Yeah, but in 5-min and + games, there’s a ton of indian cheating going on
5 hrs ago
0
#36
sndeww wrote:
bullet chess is bad. You are hardly given any time to think, you are just playing cookie clicker with extra steps. Why play chess at that point? Just go google "kung fu chess" and play that instead, it's much more fun, because it's just better bullet. In bullet you're still confined to the turn based system of the game, which beats the inherent intention of bullet chess, which is to outwit your opponent through quick movements. Yet you are still limited to how fast the opponent moves, so you get the worst of both worlds. the best part about bullet is that if you need to go pipi in your pampers you can finish the game faster, but in a slower game you can just go without needing to finish. There is no reason to play bullet, it is too fast and at the same time, too slow. Instead, if you want a game with actual thinking involved, you should play 3 minute blitz.
says the one with a 2500 bullet rating and a 2300 rapid
4 hrs ago
0
#37
sndeww wrote:
bullet chess is bad. You are hardly given any time to think, you are just playing cookie clicker with extra steps. Why play chess at that point? Just go google "kung fu chess" and play that instead, it's much more fun, because it's just better bullet. In bullet you're still confined to the turn based system of the game, which beats the inherent intention of bullet chess, which is to outwit your opponent through quick movements. Yet you are still limited to how fast the opponent moves, so you get the worst of both worlds. the best part about bullet is that if you need to go pipi in your pampers you can finish the game faster, but in a slower game you can just go without needing to finish. There is no reason to play bullet, it is too fast and at the same time, too slow. Instead, if you want a game with actual thinking involved, you should play 3 minute blitz.
True
2 hrs ago
0
#38
Magnus_Carlsen08764 wrote:
sndeww wrote:
bullet chess is bad. You are hardly given any time to think, you are just playing cookie clicker with extra steps. Why play chess at that point? Just go google "kung fu chess" and play that instead, it's much more fun, because it's just better bullet. In bullet you're still confined to the turn based system of the game, which beats the inherent intention of bullet chess, which is to outwit your opponent through quick movements. Yet you are still limited to how fast the opponent moves, so you get the worst of both worlds. the best part about bullet is that if you need to go pipi in your pampers you can finish the game faster, but in a slower game you can just go without needing to finish. There is no reason to play bullet, it is too fast and at the same time, too slow. Instead, if you want a game with actual thinking involved, you should play 3 minute blitz.
says the one with a 2500 bullet rating and a 2300 rapid
sarcasm was invented in 1746
people in 1745:
Says u how u get good at blitz if u can't play fast 🤔
