Bullet chess practice partner

Sort:
Avatar of GMinsight

I'm not sure what you want to prove and doing best to do it, but thanks for having so much interest to me and my statistics, i would like to show my skills but I don't have anything to prove to 2000 elo, when you get higher come back and we may play, thanks !

Avatar of Quite_Playable_1
GMinsight wrote:

I'm not sure what you want to prove and doing best to do it, but thanks for having so much interest to me and my statistics, i would like to show my skills but I don't have anything to prove to 2000 elo, when you get higher come back and we may play, thanks !

Why should I play you? We are not on the same level. Your 2400 bullet means nothing. When you get to 2000 rapids, we are in the same level. You are welcome.

Avatar of GMinsight

You call it nothing untill you lose in a row, stop bothering me, instead of stalking my profile my forum my statistics do something that helps you to improve so that maybe you can go further than 2000 in bullet

Avatar of GMinsight

I saw your message earlier and you deleted and making a new message just to roast someone almost 400 elo higher, you need to do better, mind your own business

Avatar of silentlambda
FrostyForks wrote:

@Quite_Playable_1

So you're good at rapid and blitz? Great. Gold star. But if you're just gonna use forums to flex and trash-talk others, maybe it’s not confidence—it’s your ego screaming for attention.

Let’s get one thing straight: @GMinsight is 2400 in bullet, which takes actual skill, speed, and nerves of steel. You tossing shade at a 2400 bullet player while clinging to your 3|0 and 10|0 stats? That’s not criticism, that’s projection.

Everyone has their strengths. Some thrive in long games, some in fast ones. But trying to drag someone down just because they’re not good in your favorite time control? That’s like a sprinter mocking a swimmer for not running fast. Different game. Different rules.

Being good at one format doesn’t make you superior. And attacking someone with a higher rating than you in bullet? Yeah… might wanna check your logic before your keyboard.

I’ll keep this short because I’m not here to argue. Just a heads-up—judging people based on your standards doesn’t make you right. It just makes you loud.

😂😂 We got chatGPT responses in this forum now

Avatar of Kn1ght_S0litary
GMinsight wrote:

As for the user @kn1ght_SOlitary: in our games, I wasn’t losing every time. I flagged you twice, but the other games were wins by checkmate or positional advantage. And since those games were unrated, I wasn’t playing with full focus. When my opponent is a few hundred Elo lower, I tend to play more casually—sometimes even opening with the h-pawn or sacrificing my queen early just to challenge myself and try to win from there. If you still doubt my ability, feel free to challenge me. I prefer to show it on the board rather than explain it with words.

Guess who finally replied. Thanks. I knew that already. Also after seeing your elo difference I was like this man is not serious. He's just like I'll have mercy on this rando 1600. It's ok. I'll get good one day.

Avatar of 1OPDONGXI

hi

Avatar of TitledNotTilted

48, Lmao I saw the same thing, and was wondering since when do Indians speak American (not english, American is a subform of english) perfectly

Avatar of silentlambda
TitledNotTilted wrote:

48, Lmao I saw the same thing, and was wondering since when do Indians speak American (not english, American is a subform of english) perfectly

not very many but surprisingly more than you'd think lol, especially those who grew up on the internet consuming western content (like myself)
That corny message was blatantly AI though lmfao

Avatar of Despair
silentlambda wrote:
FrostyForks wrote:

@Quite_Playable_1

So you're good at rapid and blitz? Great. Gold star. But if you're just gonna use forums to flex and trash-talk others, maybe it’s not confidence—it’s your ego screaming for attention.

Let’s get one thing straight: @GMinsight is 2400 in bullet, which takes actual skill, speed, and nerves of steel. You tossing shade at a 2400 bullet player while clinging to your 3|0 and 10|0 stats? That’s not criticism, that’s projection.

Everyone has their strengths. Some thrive in long games, some in fast ones. But trying to drag someone down just because they’re not good in your favorite time control? That’s like a sprinter mocking a swimmer for not running fast. Different game. Different rules.

Being good at one format doesn’t make you superior. And attacking someone with a higher rating than you in bullet? Yeah… might wanna check your logic before your keyboard.

I’ll keep this short because I’m not here to argue. Just a heads-up—judging people based on your standards doesn’t make you right. It just makes you loud.

😂😂 We got chatGPT responses in this forum now

2099 has to be painful to look at its 2100 but same time its not

Avatar of Despair

I think everyone in this forum needs a shower if they care so much about speed chess ratings that much

Avatar of PromisingPawns

Just play my guy, nobody cares about your bullet rating and most prolly you won't tilt too

Avatar of silentlambda
Despair wrote:
silentlambda wrote:
FrostyForks wrote:

@Quite_Playable_1

So you're good at rapid and blitz? Great. Gold star. But if you're just gonna use forums to flex and trash-talk others, maybe it’s not confidence—it’s your ego screaming for attention.

Let’s get one thing straight: @GMinsight is 2400 in bullet, which takes actual skill, speed, and nerves of steel. You tossing shade at a 2400 bullet player while clinging to your 3|0 and 10|0 stats? That’s not criticism, that’s projection.

Everyone has their strengths. Some thrive in long games, some in fast ones. But trying to drag someone down just because they’re not good in your favorite time control? That’s like a sprinter mocking a swimmer for not running fast. Different game. Different rules.

Being good at one format doesn’t make you superior. And attacking someone with a higher rating than you in bullet? Yeah… might wanna check your logic before your keyboard.

I’ll keep this short because I’m not here to argue. Just a heads-up—judging people based on your standards doesn’t make you right. It just makes you loud.

😂😂 We got chatGPT responses in this forum now

2099 has to be painful to look at its 2100 but same time its not

not really, i hit 2300 on lichess and realized its just pixels on a screen

Avatar of silentlambda

2099 is also a prime number so thats kinda cool

Avatar of Despair

2300 li bullets free

Avatar of silentlambda

maybe, idrc either way

Avatar of FelixG711

I got 2005 ELO today. However, the ideal training partner is 1-200 points higher rated than you. So maybe 2450-2525 would be a better range?

Avatar of GMinsight

@FelixG711

Yeah of course it would be better but I did say 2000 because I didn't think that even much higher elos will message and show willingness to be a partner

Avatar of PawnGrabbingWins
LilUnderdawg wrote:

I'm like 1400 bullet but my accurate rating is closer to 2900. Down to play whenever

LMAO

Avatar of PawnGrabbingWins

I just got to 2000+ ELO recently.

I'm in PST time zone, let me know when.