Can I become a GM?

Sort:
advancededitingtool1
bunicula wrote:

that's a story for another time, leklerk1, or can't you wait?

I for myself can't but it's obviously not your problem. Not for decades.

TimmySiahaan
sohum3894 wrote:

Frankly speaking I am very tired of playing chess all day. I am progressing very slowly. I am playing chess since 8 years now and my game is not as strong as it should have been by this time. I haven't won a single tournament till now. Probably becoming a GM is beyond my reach now. In 8 more years I will be 30 year old man and if I don't become an expert by that time, I will be nowhere. I have sacrificed my academics for chess and if I fail to reach the top in chess, I will miss out on both academic career and chess. I will be an unsuccessful man and all efforts will be wasted.😓😑😞

 

It seems you can somehow judge the situation. Please be realistic. You can do chess as a hobby instead of a profession.

Dodger111

After 260 games here of online chess you have a rating right at 1200. 

I would not characterize your game as strong. 

AIM-AceMove

Some like pfren failed, but that's not surprising ;-). You have better chance.

JonHutch

It depends on your rating now. I think if already 1900-2000 then its possible with hard work and coaching

sohum3894

Dodger111 wrote:

After 260 games here of online chess you have a rating right at 1200. 

I would not characterize your game as strong. 

Most of the games I lost on time.

advancededitingtool1

Funny as it seems most of the blitz games I have ever played I won with my opponent having enough time on the clock to finish with style the game in my favor. Really funny when you think of it.

StrategySensei007

You want to become GM, but not spent even 100$ to become the diamond member here. Improving in chess is not so cheap, you should buy books, find a coach, play a lot of tournaments. My advice to you is to push hard in your education. Chess is a very nice hobby, but with 1200 rating at 22 it is almost impossible to turn into the profession. 

BlunderLikeMagnus

Don't listen to what these fools are saying; they are weakling themselves and don't want you to get any stronger. You don't need to be a fucking child to become a grandmaster lol - stupidest thing I've heard. 

 

I'm 17, I learnt how to play chess 1 year ago and I'm already averaging 1750 ratings on different sites (in blitz) and 2000 in standard. I am better and made more improvement than most of these losers telling you you can't be a GM. Don't listen to them, they can't determine your future. Just create an opening database on chessbase, but endgame books abs middlegame books. One book I would recommend is buying NEW ART OF DEFENCE IN CHESS. Very good book, if you get really good at the defense methods and counter attacking you'll add 300 or 400 elo ratings. What really separates a GM from those is their defense and resources- and this is what the book teaches.  You should also buy middlegame books and plans for each of your opening repertoire.

 

 

BlunderLots
sohum3894 wrote:
I am 22 years old unrated player. My game is strong. I can give a tough fight to players rated in the range of 2000-2200. Do I have any chance of becoming a GM? Am I over aged to think of becoming a GM? I have no exposure to coaching. I develop my game on my own and playing with the computer and solving tactics here. Is it sufficient? At this rate how many years will it take to reach the elite level?

You won't reach GM by "developing your own game and playing with the computer and solving tactics."

To reach any sort of master class, your best bet is a serious training program. That means less waffling around online and more putting your nose to the grindstone.

Have you considered hiring a master-level chess coach?

Or, at the very least, it's time to start studying some quality chess books.

nimzomalaysian

So you do know what steroids are.

advancededitingtool1

it does look like a bitch does it

dpnorman
Rob3rtJamesFischer wrote:
dpnorman wrote:

@Teichmann Also most people who don't live in or directly near a big city can't actually play a tournament game every week, because there aren't weekly events.

Oh boy if you are right. I thought that in 2016 globalization wouldnt be a problem. Guess Ill need to move from this freaking desert in the middle of nowhere to join a tournament.

 

? ... can't tell if you're agreeing with me, being sarcastic, or what. 

 

For example, I live in Baltimore now for college, and due to the apparent closure of the Fells Point Chess Club, you basically have to go to DC for tournaments because rated chess in Baltimore doesn't exist anymore.

BlunderLots

Who needs IRL tournaments when you can play online in the comfort of your own home? :)

thegreat_patzer
sohum3894 wrote:
Teichmann70 wrote:

This is what you should do: 1) you must solve 3000 tough chess puzzles 2) you must study the endgame and solve 3000 endgame puzzle 3) you must master your openings by studying at least one book for each of your favourite opening 4) you must learn 500 most important chess strategies 5) study and analyse 200 master games. This is your learning objective for the next two years! After that you will be an expert. You must play at least one tournament game per week.

1). 2) End game is the easiest part of chess and it can be mastered within a month. .... 4) Are strategies different from tactics? 5) Studying master games doesn't help. ....Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks in advance. happy.png=

 

#2 Strongly disagree with you.  Endgames can include the hardest (practical) positions in chess- and "Mastering" them is more than a life-time task.  certainly more than a weeks worth of work

 

4) tactics are a a sequence of moves gives one player a strong advantage.  this is much more specific than a person's strategy.  you should have a strategy in every game- however tactics may give you opportunities or go against you.

very different meanings- and if you don't learn you tactics you will NOT be a strong player. simple as that

 

5) master level games are not reviewed so one can memorize the move- or in the hopes that you can repeat them against someone.   instead, you review a master level game to understand how the master found good moves agianst strong opposition.  this is another thing you will almost certainly have to do to become a gm- that you may or may not be ready for.


my opinion.

 

you won't be a gm if you don't improve- and so the first step to figure out how to do that.

I haven't looked at you games and am not qualified to  give you strong advice on what to do.

but generally, its helpful to know where you stand, what you want to do and how you intend to do that.

its also important to feel that those steps will be enjoyable. and if you do not like the process of improving in chess- it is almost certain you WON'T. as its clearly (for just about everyone) HARD to improve.

 

chess is after all a hobby and a game.  OTOH, this is all a very repetitive kind of post that has been said many zillions of times. hence the jokes. GL.

 

thegreat_patzer

I guess the thread has moved on.

I guess the thread has moved on...

 

irl tournaments Can be hard to get too,yes.

 

I'm not sure its SO hard in most universities though.  I would think that would be the kind of place where it is relatively easy to find a few fellow chess players?  (anyone I had to say something to the 1 week endgame mastery)

dpnorman
thegreat_patzer wrote:

I guess the thread has moved on.

I guess the thread has moved on...

 

irl tournaments Can be hard to get too,yes.

 

I'm not sure its SO hard in most universities though.  I would think that would be the kind of place where it is relatively easy to find a few fellow chess players?  (anyone I had to say something to the 1 week endgame mastery)

It's easy to find chess players. It's just hard to find chess players who take it very seriously and really want to put the time, effort, and money into playing or hosting regular rated events.

ArgoNavis
Rob3rtJamesFischer wrote:

Just remember you can always get good at chess, troll in the forums and get the Chess.com GM title

I sell GM titles, do you want one?

Pastuszek

yes

Elite_Shadow101
I want to be professional at chess too and I want to be 2700 by 23 you can do it I believe In you just go extremely hard on training you can do it. Get better positional skills and go hard on tactics like 30 mins a day then get opening and tactical workbook and do more analysis with the engine and u can get there