CM_grandmasterjunior wrote:
The first 10 moves were highly instructive however after that Carlsen played very weirdly with Rb1 and Bb5.
Exactly. Those are clearly engine moves.
Can someone analyze this Carlsen - Aronian game?
Sort:
0
#23
It would have been a better trick if the end wasn't nearly winning a pawn by force for black. White needed to be sure to get the a pawns off, but then black helped him do it?
I clicked through quickly, not really paying attention, and almost believed it until then.
Looking back a lot of moves were just bad... so yeah... not a GM game 
MGleason wrote:
It's a @macer75 game. See my comment #22.
Yes. I noticed your post. Seems others have not.
MGleason wrote:
It's a @macer75 game. See my comment #22.
Ok fine... can someone analyze this Macer75 - Aronian game then?
macer75 wrote:
MGleason wrote:
It's a @macer75 game. See my comment #22.
Ok fine... can someone analyze this Macer75 - Aronian game then?
Neither player hung anything, neither player tried to win. Maybe 13. b3 would have been better and tried for a battery of bishop and queen against the black king.
CM_grandmasterjunior wrote:
@sadkid2008 they could not be engine moves unless magnus carlsen uses chess titans on level 1. They are just too bad
If they are bad then why are they world champions? Think before you speak.
TheTacticianMagician wrote:
@sadkin2008 Last I checked macer75 had not one any world championships. Read before you speak.
You are mistaken.
[COMMENT DELETED]
TheTacticianMagician wrote:
macer75 wrote:
TheTacticianMagician wrote:
@sadkin2008 Last I checked macer75 had not one any world championships. Read before you speak.
You are mistaken.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/tournaments/1st-troll-chess-championship-macer75-vs-computer2-medium
Ahh, but that is a troll championship, not world championship. You didn't even have a qualifiers.
Hey look, it is the big man who thinks beating Computer 2=MEDIUM is an easy feat. Why don't you try it yourself? Many as arrogant as you have fallen in seconds.
macer75 wrote:
TheTacticianMagician wrote:
@sadkin2008 Last I checked macer75 had not one any world championships. Read before you speak.
You are mistaken.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/tournaments/1st-troll-chess-championship-macer75-vs-computer2-medium
Stunning game, two pieces up to two queens down. Truly the play of a trolling WC. --- QED by Macer I feel.
TheTacticianMagician wrote:
sadkid2008 wrote:
TheTacticianMagician wrote:
macer75 wrote:
TheTacticianMagician wrote:
@sadkin2008 Last I checked macer75 had not one any world championships. Read before you speak.
You are mistaken.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/tournaments/1st-troll-chess-championship-macer75-vs-computer2-medium
Ahh, but that is a troll championship, not world championship. You didn't even have a qualifiers.
Hey look, it is the big man who thinks beating Computer 2=MEDIUM is an easy feat. Why don't you try it yourself? Many as arrogant as you have fallen in seconds.
I never said it was an easy feat, I said the tournament did not fit the criteria for a world championship, and he didn't have a method for choosing worthy players.
As I noted in my original post in that thread, the challenger was chosen due to the extraordinary talents that it displayed in the following game:
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/computer2-medium-is-the-biggest-troll-on-chesscom
Honestly, as far as rationale for choosing the challenger goes, the TCC had more of a firm basis than quite a few other world championships (wink wink Kramnik).
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
OP, why choose a BLITZ game for analysis?!?
Piling on the pressure, forcing moves, using the clock as helper... Unless, you are playing Blitz yourself and look for ways to use in your own games? Please elaborate!