can there be two black Bishops after a pawn promotion

Sort:
Avatar of Flying-BIRDS_56
Plz help me
Avatar of Strangemover

Yes.

Avatar of Slow_pawn

If you promote 2 pawns on dark squares and choose the bishop for both, sure. Also if you already had a dark square bishop and promoted a pawn to another one as well. Hopefully you've got other pieces on the board at the time though. 

Avatar of Slow_pawn

The only thing I can think of is that one bishop takes away an escape square from the enemy king and the other bishop delivers mate. It would have to be a really unlikely, composition type scenario

Avatar of chessarx

Yes, there are rare instances where promotion to queen can produce an unintended stalemate.  It would suck to bust your rear to promote your pawn to a queen only to realize you let your opponent off the hook by way if a stalemate. 🤣

 

To the topic, yes. 

Avatar of DeadcatsPics

Because yet again, someone is being a sheeple. Of course you can. Its just not allowed by the GM secret conclave, because it could possibly expose how games are rigged by computers. You think Kasparov really played Deep Blue? No, he was simply replaced with a hologram and Deep Blue was actually playing both sides of the board. Everyone knows Kasparov could beat Deep Blue 12-0-0. 

Avatar of Slow_pawn
It didn't occur to me that the OP was being sheeple, but I guess now that I see his ratings are a little too high for him not to know the answer to that question, I guess you're right.
Avatar of RubenHogenhout


Of course.

 

 

Avatar of Ziggy_Zugzwang

 



Avatar of Ziggy_Zugzwang

Yes Ruben, I think the OP meant black squared bishops...

Avatar of RubenHogenhout

Yeah or this one two of the same collar.

 

Avatar of RubenHogenhout
Ziggy_Zugzwang schreef:

Yes Ruben, I think the OP meant black squared bishops...

 

Ok thats not what he said but also that s possible.

 

 

Avatar of Ziggy_Zugzwang

True, but we can be guided by context...

Avatar of Uncle_Bent

The only time I have underpromoted to get a second bishop of the same color (of a bishop I already have) is over 50 years ago, when I was torturing my little brother.  btw, I would think that K + 8 black Bishops v K would be a draw if the King can get to the right corner. (EDIT:  an unnecessary qualifier. It draws in all, but a few instances. )

And while I hate to admt it, this forum thread is surely a sign that we miss 21QC;

Avatar of Piperose

Looking further into the OP's query; what benefits are there for having both Bishops of the same color though?

 

Avatar of Ziggy_Zugzwang

I'm sure there must be a few study like positions were sub promotion wins and stalemate is avoided, but these are very exceptional and unlikely to occur in several life times OTB.

Avatar of Strangemover

I can't see a situation where it would be necessary to promote to a bishop, given that the queen performs the same function. 

Avatar of Slow_pawn
Strangemover wrote:

I can't see a situation where it would be necessary to promote to a bishop, given that the queen performs the same function. 

When delivering mate, you're right it wouldn't matter. It might matter in a non mate situation where a queen would stalemate the king though I guess. Otherwise it could be one of those situations where it doesn't matter what you promote to, all result in mate. Kind of like a back rank mate where queen or rook will do the job. Choose your favorite piece. I'm sure there are some compositions that require strange under promotions. 

Avatar of Piperose

Good points, thank you.

Avatar of Ziggy_Zugzwang

I under promoted in a losing position once OTB to a bishop, just so that I could say I'd done it. Life in the fast lane...