Carlsen vs Kasparov vs Fischer vs Capablanca: Who would win?!

  • 17 months ago · Quote · #61


    varelse1 wrote:
    913Glorax12 wrote:

    All four players are above human status


    Just like Coco!

    Complete agreement

  • 16 months ago · Quote · #62


    Just to mix it up and make the thread less one sided...

    Capablanca would win since hes the strongest raw talent, fastest learner and closest to a computer just on his own resources. Kasparov and fischer both needed to work extremely hard with theory and preparation. It turns out that analyzing Capas moves with a computer, they were more accurately played than any other human.

  • 14 months ago · Quote · #63


    skullyvick wrote:

    After some thought and research I find three and four player chess totally bogus because of the gang up factor of two or three players trying to eliminate a stronger or weaker player. In the case of Carlsen, Kasparov, Fischer and Capablanca you are going to see Fischer play fair while the others are going to look for the weaker moves and try to eliminate that player in tandem. Fischer would find this irritating and throw a tantrum of biblical proportions. Carlsen would keep his cool and his head down all the while calulating. Kasparov would eventually get pissed get up shake everyones hand and leave. Capablanca would be half drunk and tired from one of his all night forlics. Eventually Carlsen and Fischer would emerge as end game combatants and Carlsen would win being the better end game player.

    Fischer would shake his hand, walk away and blame poor lighting, Russian's sending radio signals into his dental fillings and of course all the Jewish people for such a disgusting loss!

    -Owen Lee Hughman

    did you really just attribute yourself to your own quote

  • 14 months ago · Quote · #64


    I do believe he just did

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #65


    Capablanca of course. He is amazing player witha  simplicity, tecnique and artist way of playing. He teachs Carlsen how to play. I must say that the style of Carlsen is the style of Capablanca. Thats the reason why i choose the amazing cuban.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #66


    Well, that is reasonable.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #67


    Lasker would win.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #68


    Fischer because he invented Fischer random so he should have more experience playing chess variants.
  • 3 months ago · Quote · #69


    capablanca would kick all their asses. then Morphy would show up and they would all,run for their lives.....

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #70


    hummmmmm .... this is very interesting ! Think it could be hard fight between Kasparov and Fischer .... I bet my money on Fischer but my favorite for his style is Capablanca.
  • 3 months ago · Quote · #71




  • 3 months ago · Quote · #72


  • 3 months ago · Quote · #73


    Anatoly Karpov

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #74



  • 3 months ago · Quote · #75


    Those two were never part of the game so how would they win?

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #76


    With magic

  • 2 months ago · Quote · #77


    "He was the first player to reach 2800"


    Fischer never reached 2800...what are you talking about?

Back to Top

Post your reply: