What is the summation of an incessant need to win without regard to what is truely at all cost.
Rules are as in many things, the defining moment for the sport of chess. Without them we would
be/ are involved in some other event. Take as an example the art of Sandbagging. When ever there exist a group of men who by the way would do anything to win cannot the end result is unsightly, take for instance the evidence elicited by the preceding diagram above. Many openings have similar systems which bring about an abrupt end.
This is in and of itself problematic While games that are played that well are scarce, they illustrate best the problem. Hardly an event that might be mislabeled the game of the century.
Many times games such as the one above are played and I am winning but a mystery to me I run out of time. That seems far fetched too. On a different site where one second per move is max, I made 120 moves in a 2 minute contest.
What this boils down too is if my rating is not serving as a proper gauge for my abilities, try not cheating my clock and match me against someone who has a rating in my neighborhood so I dont lose 10 rating points to a person rated above 2,000 when I win I don't receive 1 point for beating a GM.
Mate in 2Doubled Rooks