Look at my profile pic, it is a pawn. I'm not Janko, I told you, Janko told you. Who is conspiracy theorist. Why do you ignore my point about our ideas being different completely?
Just cause you have "math " doesn't make math correct good sir
And 2. Your aggressively denying it plus i'm ignoring your ideas mostly cause they are all dumb anyway
Look at my profile pic, it is a pawn. I'm not Janko, I told you, Janko told you. Who is conspiracy theorist. Why do you ignore my point about our ideas being different completely?
Just cause you have "math " doesn't make math correct good sir
And 2. Your aggressively denying it plus i'm ignoring your ideas mostly cause they are all dumb anyway
We post at different time, Janko is absent while I'm still posting how could that be. Janko also has very distinctive style of writing.
Interesting topic
As i switched to a new phone, and could not recall my old password, i created a new account.
On my old account i was stuck at 1300 rating for years, and all of a sudden on my this new account i have 1700 rating. Dunno how its explained.
On my old account i was stuck at 1300 rating for years, and all of a sudden on my this new account i have 1700 rating. Dunno how its explained.
Perhaps you're playing better.
Or, it could be because your account is relatively new, and you're still riding the "provisional bump", as I call it. Play at least 100 games or so, and you should see your rating settle closer to your actual playing strength (wherever that may be).
Look at my profile pic, it is a pawn. I'm not Janko, I told you, Janko told you. Who is conspiracy theorist. Why do you ignore my point about our ideas being different completely?
Just cause you have "math " doesn't make math correct good sir
And 2. Your aggressively denying it plus i'm ignoring your ideas mostly cause they are all dumb anyway
We post at different time, Janko is absent while I'm still posting how could that be. Janko also has very distinctive style of writing.
Just for reference it exposed yourself 🤣🤣
On my old account i was stuck at 1300 rating for years, and all of a sudden on my this new account i have 1700 rating. Dunno how its explained.
I dunno t could be tilt or your overrated sometimes people tilt for years and don't realize it . Typically for me if I open a new account it evens out at 2100-2200 I haven't had a jumb where I reached 2500 at a new account
Look at my profile pic, it is a pawn. I'm not Janko, I told you, Janko told you. Who is conspiracy theorist. Why do you ignore my point about our ideas being different completely?
Just cause you have "math " doesn't make math correct good sir
And 2. Your aggressively denying it plus i'm ignoring your ideas mostly cause they are all dumb anyway
We post at different time, Janko is absent while I'm still posting how could that be. Janko also has very distinctive style of writing.
Just for reference it exposed yourself 🤣🤣
Wdym
yup, there are many 1500 players here that are much stronger than 2100s here.
very rigged site.
What is this generation coming to lol
Look at my profile pic, it is a pawn. I'm not Janko, I told you, Janko told you. Who is conspiracy theorist. Why do you ignore my point about our ideas being different completely?
Just cause you have "math " doesn't make math correct good sir
And 2. Your aggressively denying it plus i'm ignoring your ideas mostly cause they are all dumb anyway
We post at different time, Janko is absent while I'm still posting how could that be. Janko also has very distinctive style of writing.
Just for reference it exposed yourself 🤣🤣
Wdym
Posting at different times means your likely an alt account as it is annoying to post at the same time with two
No it is not annoying at all you just use two browsers
no, it is annoying at all that you even bother making this troll forum
Bro I know you are angry abou elo rating being oppressive, but to be honest, what do you think chess.com will do? I feel like chess.com won't really do much since it's their site and they're not gonna change the elo to a better and unoppressed elo rating. What do you even mean the chess elo being oppressive? I don't see anyone describing chess elo as oppressive or something similar to that. Anyway I don't really care about this chess elo not being really good what do you want me to do, and all this yapping isn't even gonna improve the situation.
Yapping is what you're doing. There are few simple steps that can be done to improve the situation with ratings. I commented in other topic, copying here:
They can't break through the low Elo barrier because many low Elo players are highly skilled and they keep each other down. Like if 90% of 200 Elo players are as strong as 1000 Elo, they will be paired against each other and winratio will be 50% so their rating will not change. (sure 5% are truly 200, but another 5% is say 1200 who climb to their unwanted destination - 300 where other 1200s are crumpled). This is just an example, proportions could be different, but when there's not enough crossplay and when initial rating is inherently inaccurate such situations are unavoidable. This is called a localized pool. To remove such pools chess.com needs to conduct mandatory pool-joining tournaments and do hard recalculation with reassignments of ratings. This was described in Arpad Elo (creator of Elo system) book, I'm not making things up. And to prevent such pools, you need to stop rating people right from the start and stop them from affecting rating of others. First they must play a considerable amount of games (like 50 maybe) against players who have a well established rating, then they can receive their initial rating (not like now - you say you're beginner, advanced etc during registration and you get rated immediately and you then affect ratings of everyone - that's crazy). And you should not allow tight matchmaking, must be something random within wide range like +/- 200 Elo to ensure good cross-play, yes that would be predictable win/loss but this is necessary to avoid localized distortions.
I wasn't even accusing you of yapping, but you know what, I'm not old enough to be involved in this and just stayed quiet. Have fun checking elo ratings being oppressive I guess.
Basket is just a janko alt
Janko is probably barely even 25
I don't think so because basket is always trying to start an argument with me and claims Kramnik doesn't accuse people of cheating whereas Janko just wants chess to be fairer even if he is a little extreme.
Nah, Janko believes theres wackadoodle higher-dimensional quantum tunnelling through Plato's cave wave conjugations to change the course of history to make it so that he plays terribly, even though when he wins he calls it his "unorthodox meta-gaming strategy".
Look at my profile pic, it is a pawn. I'm not Janko, I told you, Janko told you. Who is conspiracy theorist. Why do you ignore my point about our ideas being different completely?