Forums

Chess and Intelligent Machines

Sort:
trysts
trysts
Closed: Inactive
Jul 27, 2010
0
#81
orangehonda wrote:
 
manavendra wrote:
trysts wrote:

manavendra, why do you keep deleting your comments?

To keep the mystery alive for future readers, so that they are not lost in bits and bytes.

But then who's to say I'm wrong when I happen to accidentally misquote you?

 

manavendra wrote:

Every time you see me, manavendra's just so hype
I'm dope on the floor and I'm magic on the mic
 Now why would I ever, stop doin' this
When others makin' posts, you just don't get

That's the word, because you know
You can't touch this...
Too hype can't touch this...
Stop.  Man-vendra time.

That's effing hilarious!Laughing

manavendra
manavendra
Jul 27, 2010
0
#82
trysts wrote:

You know what, manavendra, ever since Jodie Foster came up with the idea of SETI, I've had my doubts. I mean why would aliens want to communicate through radio waves? In fact, if they're close enough to receive them, why wouldn't they just pop in and out as they please, do whatever they want, observe all they need to, without ever having to communicate with beings that make other beings extinct, without a thought about it? Seems implausible.

Radio waves travelling at the speed of light seems to be a logical choice to communicate with planets which are millions of light years away. Although Aliens may appear to do many things like poping in and out in movies, they actually can't defy the basic laws of physics and science, unless they operate from higher level dimensions.

trysts
trysts
Closed: Inactive
Jul 27, 2010
0
#83
manavendra wrote:

... unless they operate from higher level dimensions.

Like you? Do you mean to say...noooo...are you saying....???????? manavendra, where exactly are you from?Surprised

manavendra
manavendra
Jul 27, 2010
0
#84
[COMMENT DELETED]
trysts
trysts
Closed: Inactive
Jul 27, 2010
0
#85

And why couldn't they pop in and out without detection? Couldn't they create a stealth system which our technology can't pick up?

orangehonda
orangehonda
Jul 27, 2010
0
#86
manavendra wrote:
Don't ever dine with orangehonda;
He feasts on flaming turpentine.
He chomps and chews on soles of gooses,
and quaffs down quarts of oily ooze.
At suppertime he'll slurp some slime.
He's known to gnaw on gristly grime.
His meals of mud and crispy crud
will curl your hair and chill your blood.
His poison, pungent, putrid snacks
may cause you seizures and attacks.
Your hair may turn completely white.
You may pass out or scream in fright.

Awesome Smile

themothman
themothman
Jul 27, 2010
0
#87

Right now the chess engines are just machine code running algorithms, referencing databases.  Now in the future, if you had some type of machine that played like a human, then the discussion might change.  See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test

 

Of course no machine like this exists, and if it did, it probably wouldn't be a machine : ).  For example, if the machine is that smart, it would probably start replicating, and do whatever it wants.

trysts
trysts
Closed: Inactive
Jul 27, 2010
0
#88
Mephisto wrote:
trysts wrote:
manavendra wrote:

... unless they operate from higher level dimensions.

Like you? Do you mean to say...noooo...are you saying....???????? manavendra, where exactly are you from?

 lol u r seriously nibbing this _____(i dunno what adjective suits this attention seeking guy, never seen some1 posting deleted texts just to gather views for the most idiotic forum topic i've ever seen ! )

Laughing I've never seen it either, Mephisto! The deletions are so bizarre! But, I suspect I've made contact with another life form!

macer75
macer75
Feb 17, 2013
0
#89

We definitely should bring this one "back to life!" This is one of the funniest threads - no, the funniest thread - that I've ever seen on chess.com!

macer75
macer75
Jan 19, 2014
0
#90

Wow... it's been 11 months since I bumped this thread, and still nobody else has posted in it? Come on people - this thread is brilliant! Maybe not the funniest, like I said 11 months ago, but it's definitely better than 99% of troll threads nowadays.

macer75
macer75
Jan 19, 2014
0
#91
macer75 wrote:

We definitely should bring this one "back to life!" This is one of the funniest threads - no, the funniest thread - that I've ever seen on chess.com!

And I can't believe I posted that just 11 months ago! I feel like I've been trolling for well over a year, but I remember when I posted that I hadn't started trolling yet. Wow... suddenly it feels like time has been going by so slowly!

KantTouchThis
KantTouchThis
Jan 19, 2014
0
#92

hello there lonely person

trysts
trysts
Closed: Inactive
Jan 19, 2014
0
#93

Wow, I thought this thread was deletedLaughing

Ubik42
Ubik42
Jan 19, 2014
0
#94
trysts wrote:
manavendra wrote:
trysts wrote:
manavendra wrote:
"I think the aim of Intelligent Machines and Intelligent Life is one and the same."

What would that be?

The aim is to create Intelligence, or self-decision making machines.

Dolphins want to create machines?

Well, they do.

The machines they make look like tiny dolphins.