Chess Cheating Hits New High!

Sort:
utyuu

It kinda sucks. Technology is really useful but it shows us how pathetic we are. We all love competition but it is coming to an end at some point because we just can't compare to machines. The singularity or something.

Kinda makes me want to seek greener pastures with go or shogi or something, but even those are only a matter of time before nobody can beat computers and before everyone can carry a world-beating program in their pocket.

Polar_Bear_Fist_Pump
utyuu wrote:

It kinda sucks. Technology is really useful but it shows us how pathetic we are. We all love competition but it is coming to an end at some point because we just can't compare to machines. The singularity or something.

Kinda makes me want to seek greener pastures with go or shogi or something, but even those are only a matter of time before nobody can beat computers and before everyone can carry a world-beating program in their pocket.


 

Just keep on truckin.  It's both a blessing and a curse that computers are better than 99.5% of humans now at chess.  A part of me wants the pre-computer Chess days back, but a part of me also wants to keep the post-computer days.

waffllemaster
OnlineChessLessons wrote:
waffllemaster wrote:

"Cheating hits a new high"

Proceeds to quote examples from 10 years ago and even then produces only a handful of examples.


So if you had actually read the post I think you would have figured out that I was referencing the CURRENT scandal going on involving members of the French Olympiad team.  The examples were provided to illustrate the broad spectrum and methods of offenses (that can and do take place, TODAY).


It's too bad caps and bold can't make up for wiring skills.  The title didn't say current, it said hits new high.  Nowhere in the post did you illustrate what you meant by new high.  People shouldn't have to figure out your writing, you should state what you mean clearly.  The French example is not a new high in terms of venue, class of player, or prize fund.

It is clear though you just wanted to talk about your thoughts on cheats and punishment which I didn't read on my hunch that the 2nd half would be as worthless as the first.

GargleBlaster
waffllemaster wrote:

It's too bad caps and bold can't make up for wiring skills.


At first glance it's difficult to argue with this statement, but what if your computer short circuits and you have to use your cell phone to surf the internet for a website that explains how to rewire it?  See, the problem there is the words are too small to make out on your tiny cell phone screen unless the author used caps and bold.

Niko_11

Most sports are ruined with too much money, but there will always be more amateur than proffesional. I know so many people who stoped playing sport because they were not selected for a team because of their coach's unfair preference to weaker players. Cheating and computers are not such a problem as not having equipment, place to play, friends to play with and experienced people to teach you.

Ziryab
Polar_Bear_Fist_Pump wrote:
utyuu wrote:

It kinda sucks. Technology is really useful but it shows us how pathetic we are. We all love competition but it is coming to an end at some point because we just can't compare to machines. The singularity or something.

Kinda makes me want to seek greener pastures with go or shogi or something, but even those are only a matter of time before nobody can beat computers and before everyone can carry a world-beating program in their pocket.


 

Just keep on truckin.  It's both a blessing and a curse that computers are better than 99.5% of humans now at chess.  A part of me wants the pre-computer Chess days back, but a part of me also wants to keep the post-computer days.


Who is in the 0.5%? Must be some untitled players here, because the World Champion was passed by when Fritz 9 came out a few years ago.

Jason112

u guys are talking abt cheating when there is big suspicisions that magnus carlsen is A.I. (aritficial intelligence) altough not proven. he is made of silicon. now and then he just throws off games so not to be too obvious.

Here_Is_Plenty

Erik, protect us from these cheats!

OnlineChessLessons

yea i guess maybe the whole toiletgate reference was kind of out of line, I just wanted to make the point of how out of hand the situation is getting at all levels.

Jason112

take me to your leader...

Ziryab
Estragon wrote:
Fezzik wrote:

Most of the top players in the world blame Danailov and Topalov for "toiletgate", not Kramnik. They exaggerated how many times Kramnik went to the bathroom. Oh, and Kramnik's moves weren't particularly "computer-like". Topalov was losing and decided to try to win the match away from the board. If there was cheating in that match, it was by team Topalov.

Kramnik was fully within his rights at the time to go to the bathroom as many times as he wanted. There was absolutely no evidence, either physical or in the moves chosen, that Kramnik was cheating.


 

Especially since he wasn't actually "going to the bathroom" all those times.  Each player had a little sitting room offstage with a toilet attached.  They were allowed by the rules to be in there, and a camera monitored all but the actual toilet area.  Kramnik was a pacer, and paced back and forth, using the toilet area to extend his pacing length.  While in there he wasn't on camera, but he was back out in seconds most times (except when he was really using it).  This is where Danilov came up with the "50 times" stuff.

There is even precedent for this behavior.  In the Spassky-Korchnoi Candidates' Match after Korchnoi had defected, Spassky spent nearly all his time in the sitting room, emerging only to move in several games.  Korchnoi did complain, but to no avail.  And in one of the Karpov-Korchnoi matches, Karpov did almost the same thing, never being at the board when Korchnoi was on move. 


well said

OnlineChessLessons

Ok so Kramnik is a natural monster and was Not cheating.  However, it definitely seems like 2600+ Sebastien Feller was cheating at the latest Olympiad with the help of 2 other members of the French team.  So it's obvious cheating in chess is starting to spiral out of control, at all levels.  I wrote this post to shed light on the problem and more importantly, to propose solutions to fix it.

JamesRook

What about Kasparov vs. Deep Blue?  Did IBM use GM's to mess with the log functions in game 2 of the second match?  I mean...did they ever show the proof that Deep Blue actually made that "human-like" move? 

 

Thought, comments?

OnlineChessLessons
JamesRook wrote:

What about Kasparov vs. Deep Blue?  Did IBM use GM's to mess with the log functions in game 2 of the second match?  I mean...did they ever show the proof that Deep Blue actually made that "human-like" move? 


I believe IBM simply denied the allegation but did not provide clear proof.  However, they were employing a team of GMs to help with the programming and during-match adjustments - so it's possible Deep Blue simply improve it's positional intuition and play through it's ample interactions with the human GM team.  Personally, I don't think IBM cheated during the match.

Ziryab

Accusations of cheating are at an all-time high, as are the technologies that facilitate unfair assistance. Actual cheating, however, probably not elevated much. Detection methods are keeping pace with cheating innovations leading to a few high profile stories.

TheOldReb

More and more cheating with less and less shame !  I blame it on today's PC environment and the bogus crap taught to kids these days like "situational ethics " and there is no " right" or "wrong " ...  When I was a young man men cheated on their wives ( some, not all ) but even those who did kept it secret and were probably ashamed of the fact so didnt want people to know...... now it seems some men even brag of their infidelities and its just wink, wink, all round.... Oh, and same goes for the women !  ( dont want to be labeled a sexist afterall ! ) Wink

Jason112

NM Reb ur a sexist :D :P

OnlineChessLessons

I was flipping through an old Chess Life magazine and came across the following quote by Edward Lasker in The Adventure of Chess: "Perhaps the increasing laxity of chess morals is a reflection of the general decay of ethics bound to develop in an age in which the defeat of the competitor in the minds of most people has become the end that sanctifies the means, in business as well as in politics.  That does not make the state of affairs less disgusting."

I thought it was interesting how this might apply to the posted topic.

Ziryab
Reb wrote:

More and more cheating with less and less shame !  I blame it on today's PC environment and the bogus crap taught to kids these days like "situational ethics " and there is no " right" or "wrong " ...  When I was a young man men cheated on their wives ( some, not all ) but even those who did kept it secret and were probably ashamed of the fact so didnt want people to know...... now it seems some men even brag of their infidelities and its just wink, wink, all round.... Oh, and same goes for the women !  ( dont want to be labeled a sexist afterall ! ) 


How do personal computers contribute to the degeneration of morals? Easy access to porn?

goldendog

PC= political correctness

This forum topic has been locked