Yeah
Chess.com is flooded with cowards
Sort:
1 day ago
0
#123
Markus-Schneider wrote:
exceptionalfork wrote:
Markus-Schneider wrote:
duone wrote:
also @Markus-Schneider however you want to hit me back for my last comment, im 11 years old and even i know better than you. CALM DOWN
If you are actually 11, you are breaking TOS.
The age requirement is 13.
No. Children under 13 are allowed on this site as long as the account is permitted and monitored by a parent or legal guardian.
Allowed to play chess, not to indulge in the forum unsupervised.
Children under 13 are allowed in the forums. We have no way of knowing whether @duone is being supervised or not, so that's pretty hard to enforce.
1 day ago
0
#124
@Markus-Schneider
I think he is trolling and attention seeking. This comment is made as an effort to stop further commenting on this unnecessary post.
Please don't reply with : "Erm, that's a foolish and EMOTIONAL COMMENT! Outrageous! He didn't even acknowledge what I said!"
*pushes up glasses* *sniffles* *s--ts himself*
chess12343219999 wrote:
@Markus-Schneider
I think he is trolling and attention seeking. This comment is made as an effort to stop further commenting on this unnecessary post.
Please don't reply with : "Erm, that's a foolish and EMOTIONAL COMMENT! Outrageous! He didn't even acknowledge what I said!"
*pushes up glasses* *sniffles* *s--ts himself*
Actually, you're the one seeking attention. If I were in your position, I’d just ignore the post and move on.
But you? You’re trying to come off as the “smart one” who sees through the so called troll.. as if you’re above everyone else here. Classic indirect attention seeking. Very transparent.
Also, that line, “This comment is made as an effort to stop further commenting on this unnecessary post”, only reveals your jealousy over how much attention this thread is getting
> The only real explanation is that it protects the cowards...
I just imagined the business meeting of chess.com's high staff in a dark hall filled with smoke of cigarettes. Silence. Somebody is hard breathing. And the voice: "We need to protect cowards..."
exceptionalfork wrote:
Markus-Schneider wrote:
exceptionalfork wrote:
Markus-Schneider wrote:
duone wrote:
also @Markus-Schneider however you want to hit me back for my last comment, im 11 years old and even i know better than you. CALM DOWN
If you are actually 11, you are breaking TOS.
The age requirement is 13.
No. Children under 13 are allowed on this site as long as the account is permitted and monitored by a parent or legal guardian.
Allowed to play chess, not to indulge in the forum unsupervised.
Children under 13 are allowed in the forums. We have no way of knowing whether @duone is being supervised or not, so that's pretty hard to enforce.
Well they are now blocked. I enforce my own rules here.
> Children under 13 are allowed in the forums
I dont really know where you read this. According to the User's Agreement users must be 13 at least. Between 13 and the legal age (depends on the country) users must use chess.com under supervision.
But in fact chess.com does not care if there is no legal responsibility
Bro I read this whole discussion and I can say… this is so idiotic. Best of 3 would be a cool feature, but we have the right to play one game and move on! You make a whole forum about how people “have to accept rematches” when you can just click the create new game button and move on in seconds.
And why do you call them “cowards”. Maybe they just have a life outside of chess!
1 day ago
0
#131
What made you decide that so many members are "cowards?" Do you look at everyone's games?
1 day ago
0
#132
Markus-Schneider wrote:
A bunch of cowards who are scared of rematches.
Chess.com should implement a forced best of 3 format for short time controls. That way we can expose the cowards who use excuses like "I only had time for one game" No fool, you clearly agreed to a best of 3.
I’m tired of all the fragility on this website. Stop defending the cowards. EXPOSE THEM!
"I lost and I refuse to admit it, so we should force best out of 3 in the hopes that I'll get lucky in the 2 other games and not just humiliate myself further"
You can cry all you want but no one is obligated to rematch you, end of story.
You complaining about it just shows you're salty whenever you lose.
Oh my gosh...for the umpteenth time, some people just DON'T LIKE REMATCHES. Get over it.
Markus-Schneider wrote:
Its not about anyone owing anything. Its about people not making the game fun. The most fun comes from proving that you are either better, worse, or on the same level as your opponent. One game cannot prove that.
My fun comes from playing a variety of given opponents in a single sitting. Not playing one over and over and over again.
"Its about people not making the game fun" When I lose 3 games in a row......that's when I know I'm having fun. 
Maybe I just want to play different people? I don't see a problem with that stop whining.
Chess is not about labeling others. If you want it to be fun, then try forcing yourselves to accept the ultimate chess challenge which to me is having a checkmate win/loss record which reflects me as a player having more checkmate wins than losses. Nothing more... nothing less.
Let's talk about that word "coward" then for a bit. What is a coward? Oh yeah, it is someone who in the face of real danger (and a chess game does not count as real danger) who runs away instead of facing it head on. You know like in a situation where someone might actually lose their life if someone else doesn't intervene, for example. Here's a question I would like to pose then.... why do members on this site play bullet chess like its rapid chess, but also play rapid chess like it is bullet chess? Tell me somebody please how that makes any sense at all?
also @Markus-Schneider however you want to hit me back for my last comment, im 11 years old and even i know better than you. CALM DOWN
If you are actually 11, you are breaking TOS.
The age requirement is 13.
No. Children under 13 are allowed on this site as long as the account is permitted and monitored by a parent or legal guardian.
Allowed to play chess, not to indulge in the forum unsupervised.