Chess.com or Lichess?

Sort:
JustALifeOfChess
Magikstone wrote:

Although there are cheaters in every site, cheaters on yahoo normally had very high ratings. As I was a mere beginner, I didn't have to worry about cheating that way. If you were truly that strong where you were allowed to be play against high rated yahoo players with colors red, then you must be a very strong player.

All the comments on Yahoo chess are good but maybe we should remove it from our talk?

Yahoo chess now:

GodOFCOW123123

i have a question, i have a similar topic before why i only got a few comments?

BigChessplayer665
SleepyAmelia wrote:

I would always say chess.com but after losing my last two games because chess.com randomly disconnects me while I have perfect connection to the website (only disconnect from the game itself) I might just move to lichess tbh.

That's a server issue the servers probably laggy on your end(or chess.coms ) even if the connection is fine thats mostly why I only play bullet on lichess the occasional 3 second lagg spike

spideypowers

nice

spideypowers

lol

T-jankins9522
Chess.com needs variants on mobile.
spideypowers

it does not have variants on mobile???

Foxy_sky

i like chess and lichess

JBarryChess

I started using Lichess for bullet, but I don't like the fact that you can't customize the board. Not enough contrast for me.

Pandu9

lichess because its free

BigChessplayer665
Pandu9 wrote:

lichess because its free

Also better puzzles and a cleaner arena system

la-fortiche

hi moi parler ffrancais

Foxy_sky

??

Zynorix

Chess.com.

Ziryab
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Pandu9 wrote:

lichess because its free

Also better puzzles and a cleaner arena system

Lichess Arena pairings are too slow.

BigChessplayer665
Ziryab wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Pandu9 wrote:

lichess because its free

Also better puzzles and a cleaner arena system

Lichess Arena pairings are too slow.

For me they aren't i get 1800-2200s all the time in arena pairings if you get like top 10-30 it should be consistant

But if your 2500+ they are probably too lol but you can always practice your speed and berserk even if they are too low

Ziryab
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Pandu9 wrote:

lichess because its free

Also better puzzles and a cleaner arena system

Lichess Arena pairings are too slow.

For me they aren't i get 1800-2200s all the time in arena pairings if you get like top 10-30 it should be consistant

But if your 2500+ they are probably too lol but you can always practice your speed and berserk even if they are too low

I’ve run Arena tournaments on Lichess for groups of students and had more than half of the students waiting to get paired.

I’ve played in tournaments with 1000 participants and waited five minutes for a pairing.

Neither of these things happen on chessdotcom where I’ve rarely had to wait twenty seconds for a game.

BigChessplayer665
Ziryab wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Pandu9 wrote:

lichess because its free

Also better puzzles and a cleaner arena system

Lichess Arena pairings are too slow.

For me they aren't i get 1800-2200s all the time in arena pairings if you get like top 10-30 it should be consistant

But if your 2500+ they are probably too lol but you can always practice your speed and berserk even if they are too low

I’ve run Arena tournaments on Lichess for groups of students and had more than half of the students waiting to get paired.

I’ve played in tournaments with 1000 participants and waited five minutes for a pairing.

Neither of these things happen on chessdotcom where I’ve rarely had to wait twenty seconds for a game.

True the pairings can be a bit slow though I have never had an issue where it took longer than a minute to two

If you actually look for good arenas on chess.com they are better though more at risk of getting things like cheaters than lichess

spideypowers

hmm...

Yusufizanjinah
Who ever writes here lichess is an idiot cuz you don’t know what ur writing this on