chess .com vs lichess

Chessdotcom has vastly more players. Of course, there will be more cheaters. Lichess is less likely to take action against cheaters.

Lichess is better
Better when it comes to pure playing. But chess bot has better features. That being said I'm a paid diamond member

Chessdotcom has vastly more players. Of course, there will be more cheaters. Lichess is less likely to take action against cheaters.
Form what Ive read, lichess has better chest controls. But himestly if you're willing to drop a few bucks pee month chees Punto com has better features and Thier analysis is more intuitive

Chessdotcom has vastly more players. Of course, there will be more cheaters. Lichess is less likely to take action against cheaters.
Form what Ive read, lichess has better chest controls. But himestly if you're willing to drop a few bucks pee month chees Punto com has better features and Thier analysis is more intuitive
Cheat* controls

I think lichess is kinda overrated because me and my friend got banned because we reported eachother because one of us was hacking and our accounts got deleted
I honestly don't understand how your dual banning is relevant to which sure has better analysis

Most serious players use Lichess unless they're sponsored. Lichess is better for reasons such as better/quicker analysis, free puzzles and the studying resources. The only upside to chess.com is it's chess learning videos, rating system, and the bots to play against. But you can't beat free and if you're 2000+ Lichess is clearly the better site.
I have a feeling this thread is going to be deleted soon.
Say what you may, and I'm a fan of both. But the analysis on chess dot is bot faster, more intuitive and better than lichess, that of course if you're willing to pay to have more than one of those a day

I say Chess.com > Lichess because chess.com has accurate rating system, More players and most importantly chess.com looks wayy better than lichess
Both sites have good and bad points and I play on both of them. I suspect that Lichess has a higher proportion of "serious" players, as my percentile is much lower there.

Both sites have good and bad points and I play on both of them. I suspect that Lichess has a higher proportion of "serious" players, as my percentile is much lower there.
I’d have to agree. I play on both and support both financially. However, the percentile is not necessarily the most critical measure. Chessdotcom has vastly more strong players, especially titled players. I have beaten well over 200 titled players on chessdotcom with an overall losing record against them. I’ve played less than half a dozen titled players on Lichess, AFAIK.

Both sites have good and bad points and I play on both of them. I suspect that Lichess has a higher proportion of "serious" players, as my percentile is much lower there.
I’d have to agree. I play on both and support both financially. However, the percentile is not necessarily the most critical measure. Chessdotcom has vastly more strong players, especially titled players. I have beaten well over 200 titled players on chessdotcom with an overall losing record against them. I’ve played less than half a dozen titled players on Lichess, AFAIK.
Lichess has tournaments reserved for those who are titled. If you check one of them out you'll find numerous players with ratings over 2500 and a few over 3000 in blitz.
Lichess is better