Two words : Feedback loops.
You can study, practice, read, listen, watch and do any "solo" activity but unless you get your chess playing critiqued periodically, you really aren't going to make efficient use of your time.
Get with a strong player, post a few of your games on these forums and ask for feedback. Like learning a new language by immersing oneself around native speakers, you want more experienced players to keep pointing at things you are doing from game to game that "instantly" strikes them as wrong.
90% of what I know about chess came from getting yelled at to "not do this, not do that'.
Given where you are currently at, Chess Mentor is quite good if you choose to progress through the lessons sequentially (from the beginning) and not use the default (adaptive) mode.
Hi everybody, I apologise if you get these kinds of posts a lot, but I thought it might be interesting to get some feedback from more experienced players.
I am a beginner to chess, having only started to play it a few weeks ago. So far I'd say I've learned quite a lot; openings and end-games and an assortment of trap moves, yet I still seem to be losing to low level computers and real players quite a lot.
I was just wondering how did the more experienced chess players here "up their game" so to speak? Is it just an issue of practice practice practice? Did you use books/articles? Also I was wondering if the "Chess Mentor" feature really helped anyone improve their chess, as I'm planning to upgrade my account later this year to start using it if so.
Many thanks for any info you're willing to share!