chess is a game of mind how true it is in this era😇
Sort:
Many people think that chess is a mind game but still many intelligent people getting excellent marks in exams fails to play good chess so I don't think intelligent only makes a chess player great technique matters
May 19, 2017
0
#2
Being good at chess doesn't mean someone is intelligent, it just takes study.
Similarly, getting good marks doesn't mean someone is intelligent, it just takes study.
Similarly, getting good marks doesn't mean someone is intelligent, it just takes study.
1818-1828271 wrote:
yeah that is what I'm saying it takes proper study not only being intelligent meant you play good
Being good at chess doesn't mean someone is intelligent, it just takes study.
Similarly, getting good marks doesn't mean someone is intelligent, it just takes study.
May 19, 2017
0
#4
Yeah, I think being good at anything is like 90% study and hard work, 10% talent
May 19, 2017
0
#5
It does seem obvious but you'd be surprised how many people give up on something just because they aren't good at it right away. Like they don't understand that the people who are good also sucked at one point earlier on.
chess is a game of luck   ,  90% luck  5%  killer instinct ,  5% God writes the destiny .
If the intelligence was important the asians  ( best IQ ) sh0uld be in the top 10 world ranking.   Â
barakosama wrote:
no man not 90% luck a 2700 ell player will beat a 2100 player every time they will play that is no luck
chess is a game of luck   ,  90% luck  5%  killer instinct ,  5% God writes the destiny .
If the intelligence was important the asians  ( best IQ ) sh0uld be in the top 10 world ranking.   Â
1818-1828271 wrote:
yeah your point is good but who will teach them they just want to do it the easy way and not getting hard work they quit it
It does seem obvious but you'd be surprised how many people give up on something just because they aren't good at it right away. Like they don't understand that the people who are good also sucked at one point earlier on.
barakosama wrote:
chess is a game of luck   ,  90% luck  5%  killer instinct ,  5% God writes the destiny .
If the intelligence was important the asians  ( best IQ ) sh0uld be in the top 10 world ranking.   Â
wow! that is an amazing amount of BS for such a little post. A big congrats on you- its not easy to troll with such efficiency
Argammonchess wrote:
no bro I am myself get it in your head I have nothing to do with him anyways my account is okay and I play fairly check my games
AlsoGMgodofchess14 wrote:
1818-1828271 wrote:
It does seem obvious but you'd be surprised how many people give up on something just because they aren't good at it right away. Like they don't understand that the people who are good also sucked at one point earlier on.
they are not just made for that thing that is also true if every human will understand what he is really capable of in his own field this world would have a full of perfection
Hmm. You got banned for cheating and immediately you create a new account with a very similar name?!Â
Â
Also, monkeychess09 is probably also you. Do you need to chat with yourself?!
Â
stuzzicadenti wrote:
yeah if all will become grandmasters then no point to play this game anymore
those who are naturally talented + study/work hard can have the potential to reach grandmaster. the rest of the people study the game and practice it for many years but never have possibility of reaching that level.
May 19, 2017
0
#12
Im pretty sure anyone who studies properly for 8+ hours a day will reach grandmaster, regardless of talent. Talent might push you from 2500 to 2800 though. Most of us aren't grandmasters because we don't want to put in that amount of work, sacrificing many other things along the way. Much of what we consider "talent" is just a fascination and willingness to devote one's entire existence to a single activity.
May 19, 2017
0
#13
This is why you should respect people who are masters at anything - it's not natural talent you should praise, it's the fact that they've sacrificed their whole lives to become masters.
Saying you can't become a grandmaster is a lazy excuse that is insulting to the people who put in the time. You're saying it was easier for them. Let me tell you it wasn't. Respect the work and time they've put in.
Saying you can't become a grandmaster is a lazy excuse that is insulting to the people who put in the time. You're saying it was easier for them. Let me tell you it wasn't. Respect the work and time they've put in.
1818-1828271 wrote:
yeah I respect them you are right 1000% good point
This is why you should respect people who are masters at anything - it's not natural talent you should praise, it's the fact that they've sacrificed their whole lives to become masters.
Saying you can't become a grandmaster is a lazy excuse that is insulting to the people who put in the time. You're saying it was easier for them. Let me tell you it wasn't. Respect the work and time they've put in.
But in Chess You have to Popp it like a hot dog with Ketchup
May 19, 2017
0
#16
1818-1828271 wrote:
Yeah, I think being good at anything is like 90% study and hard work, 10% talent
This applies to the 99 percentile.
However, there is no substitute for gifted natural talent. No amount of study or physical hard work can compete with the very few who are naturally gifted. Goes for sport as well as chess.
Chess is all work and no gain. Yet it is somehow fun XD
May 19, 2017
0
#18
Even talented people are only good because of the hard work they put in, which is my entire point. Reading comprehension is your friend.
May 19, 2017
0
#19
note that: Chess is not a game of *mind* but, ITS A GAME OF ```BRAIN```
