@Bonsai_Dragon
It appers you are quite familiar with dictionaries, I thought you might be need to check this headword in your book:
- "trolling" .
Red is in actual fact a past tense of read, it has just not been included in the online dictinaries yet.
Risk's a great game. Conquer Australia and rule the world, get the two armies per attacking turn and put everything on Thailand and spread out from there...
Risk's a great game. Conquer Australia and rule the world, get the two armies per attacking turn and put everything on Thailand and spread out from there...
Careful. You never know which world leaders might be reading this.
Are Australian women hot? So far I just know that German women are actually men, french women dont take baths. Mexican women are dangerous, and that Russian women are the ideal standard.
Anyways, await soon, cause next I will talk about the middlegame monopoly. I dont know what I was thinking when I told those crappy chess editorials to message me, but they HAVE BEEN SPAMMING MY INBOX with all their new books and it is time for my revenge.
I still hope "red" is actually valid. And if it isnt, I will make it valid. This is where the trend starts. Time to change the world.
NO, NEW IN CHESS, I DONT FREAKING CARE ABOUT YOUR NEW BOOK ON MIDDLEGAME ATTACKS FOR CLUB PLAYERS, I FREAKING DONT.
London system is indeed crappy if one compares it to the exchange French, this is the opening the chess world should be giving its attention now.
I still hope "red" is actually valid. And if it isnt, I will make it valid. This is where the trend starts. Time to change the world.
It's an irregular verb
"
One very irregular verb is "to read", which is the same when written down in the past tense, but pronounced differently. In the present tense, "read" is pronounced like the word "reed" or "seed", but in the past tense it is pronounced the same as "red". In the example below the spelling of the verb does not change, though the tense (and thus the pronunciation) does.
"I read the newspaper every day" (present tense) becomes "I read the newspaper yesterday." (past tense)" - https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/145638/why-do-we-say-and-write-read-instead-of-readed-for-the-past
Just goes to prove English is poop, I dont even know why I was forced to learn it, it is not like I have plans of emigrating into the US of A.
De ahora en adelante hablare en español.
London system is indeed crappy if one compares it to the exchange French, this is the opening the chess world should be giving its attention now.
How do you win the exchange French as black?
You play it against a weaker opponent and then you try to win on time. its super effective.
Si, para cada apertura hay un setup que la REFUTA, pero en este monopolio nadie te dice el setup que la refuta chummyboy. THAT IS THE PROBLEM, AND THE PROOF THAT THIS IS ALL A MONOPOLY.
I still hope "red" is actually valid. And if it isnt, I will make it valid. This is where the trend starts. Time to change the world.
Weirdest things have been seen. Some people here yet translates "remove" as "remover" here.
Dude, it is a hoax. a big conspiracy, but you need to know the truth.
many years ago when faber and faber published the iconic chess book By Bobby Fischer "My 60 memorable games" - Fischer whined incessantly about copyrights and royalties and not getting paid fairly, etc. In disgust and protest he quit chess and ultimately faked his own death a few years back at the age of 64. (yes, you heard me right- faked his own death)
There are many chess players that are trying to raise enough money to coax him back out to play and defeat Magnus. But we all know it will require about $10 Million dollars to properly pursuade him to come out of hiding and play. The supreme irony is that he is hiding in an undisclosed location somewhere in London, England.
several writers have written books on the London opening with the intention of donating all proceeds to the Fischer -Carlsen match promotion fund.
so my recommendation to you is that if you ever want to see the two greatest of all time compete, with Kasparov as match arbiter, please go buy a book on the london as soon as possible. in fact, please buy ten copies and give them to your friends.
Why does someone read about moves in a book though not gain by experience of such this fun game, and create their own tactics? The FUN OF THE GAME is your options to defend or conquer.
I'm pleased my progress in doing so, used to always give opponents white and when I came back to again play it after two years decided because how many "do" read on chess maybe wise to create my own variation and am very pleased I have.
I am happy this site shares a few daily tactics, but that's as far as I will look into what's possible for moves, variations, because to me what this game is about is what you can work out of based your growth of this great game through time playing.
Can someone help me? This guy from New in Chess has been harrasing me with mails telling me about all their books.
Is there any editorial that does not want to get my money? THAT ACTUALLY CARES ABOUT ME? 
Lol, talking about New In Chess... the founder just died, is his spirit coming for me?
Ziggy_Zugzwang wrote:
If chess is a monopoly, can I be the 'Top Hat' or the 'Boot' ?
Strangemover wrote:
The boot, the wheelbarrow and the thimble have been replaced in the latest version with a T-Rex, a penguin and a 'rubber ducky', the first changes to the pieces since the game was launched in 1935.
And Z_Z then wrote:
My sister used to like the iron, which I thought was the worst token.
Followed by once again Strange:
It's all about the car for me. Or the boat. My old man was always the dog.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
shoe
ohhh that's right it was a boot
Actually been playing these childhood games recently with my brother's kids. Last week I was not a winner at The Game of Life. Might Go For Broke this weekend.