Chess is just a Game of luck

skill is a way of luck, we have already refuted it.

That isn't even close to the realm of reality or what mathematicians (or physicists) say. I mean there might be some that do but then they're not very good at it.

If you take a player new to the game, teach them the rules, and they just play, with not study or discussion of games with their opponents, they are going to get very good at the game. If they study and practice, they will get better, though there is likely an upper limit for many people based on outside factors (which may or may not have anything to do with luck).
There are likely some very rare individuals that can get very good just by playing but they would very likely improve much more quickly by study and working at it.

Effort most certainly matters.

Effort always matters, but luck determines everything.

I recommend the Woody Allen movie, "Match Point," (2005) they talk a bit about this issue of luck.

Again, given the widest definition of luck ... maybe. It's lucky I was born when I was was, had the opportunities I did, haven't yet suffered random catastrophe, etc. The intersections of my choices (which are neither random or based on luck) are certainly influenced by the interaction between other members of society I have interactions with. Those things are not pre-determined. Things may be deterministic based on societal norms, cognitive shortcuts the brain uses, etc that impact the probabilities but they do not make the determinations.

Everything is predetermined whether you like it or not, and the exact day and time of your death is already determined just as the day and time you were born was. It's not very hard to understand, it's pure common sense.

I feel like most mathematicians would say we have no idea he's trying to argue what feels like randomness vs deterministic which we both can't tell but idk I could be remembering wrong

But how it's determined changes the very fundamental nature for if it's deterministic or not and how it is you can't really make a rock solid argument without it sure you can make an ok argument but not 100% provable making that decision without understanding the nature of how it works is a big mistake especially in the realm of mathematics and science you can make assumptions based on other things like proving evolution without knowing what the start is but this is different as it's talking about the laws of the universe it's likely that we will mess up with one or two things that have very big impacts (ex dark matter ) which we have no idea what it is or dark energy(which may not actually exist ) ps: humans don't do common sense arguing that it is makes it seem even more nieve common sense isn't an argument

Just stop y'all. OP isn't interested in a chess discussion. It's a philosophy lecture.

Shhh we all need to correct him in the tiniest details until he leaves even if we are wrong it would be really funny

the only luck in chess is that has a 1% higher winner rate thats it 1% higher is winnable for black Chess is full of strategy tactics an open mindset learning and thousends of stuff not luck at all it can feel like you get a lucky win but its not luck at all

It’s clear that there’s no interest in knowing the truth about the matter. I’ve already told you that I verified the mathematical certainty of the impossibility of free will. If you ever have interest, I can show you all the evidence. I won’t discuss it any further. Those who want to know the truth should study on their own, and they will reach the same conclusions as I did.

It can be reached through science, philosophy, but I reached it through gematria, through a deep study of it in the English language

good luck

There is luck in my chess games

I dunno it also depends what you mean by free will just like luck

Free will means the supposed ability of an individual to act differently from the script of their existence.

Someone who believes in free will thinks they can change that script.

Okay Ill bite. If its all mathematical and provable what is going to happen... 1. Where do you get the numbers from 2. Once I got the proof for the next 20 years.. I can then go change whatever the numbers tell me. 3. If the numbers are only available after the fact.. then it sounds to me like an emergent property from the events, not the other way round.

Okay, your move.

Chance doesn't exist, so in theory, luck doesn't exist either. Everything follows an inevitable order in the universe.

But we still use the term "luck" to refer to the fortune someone has had in winning a game.

You could say, "But he's more skilled, that's why he won," but skill is also a form of luck. It's like with beauty someone who's good looking has luck, just like someone who's not.

It is almost never possible to predict an event before it happens, although there are people who specialize in this within the world of gematria, known as gematria decoders.

Once the event happens, you can find its hidden numerology, which is easier because you already have all the information available.

But these numbers must have some kind of coherence for the gematria community to accept your code, and so it doesn't look like you're inventing meaningless numerical connections, because many people do that.

There are various ways to obtain the numbers.

The most paradigmatic and famous case is the 9/11 attack, where there were many 11s everywhere, and 911 also appeared.

I have analyzed other cases, like the Nice attack (2016) and the Barcelona attack (2017).

But I didn't study these cases with gematria because, at that time, I hadn't studied anything about this topic.

If you want, we can start by looking at the death of Muhammad Ali and how the day and year of his death were destined.

I have no knowledge on the matter as I think it is bogus..

But again, if the "hidden numerology" is only available after the event, this hints at it being emergent from the way events did happen.. Not the other way around. What is the evidence supporting the deterministic point of view?

I see that you have biases by calling it a bogus ; this way, it’s impossible for you to even begin studying anything.

Negative, numerology is always present before events happen, and by the way, I proved this by publishing a book in March 2022, where I compiled all the numerological codes gathered from the gematria community, which indicated beyond any doubt that Argentina would win the World Cup that same year in December.

Logically, the normal approach is not to predict an event but to study past events through an in-depth analysis of this numerology. And if you do so, you will come across very interesting surprises. But of course, if you have prejudices, it’s impossible for you to even consider doing it, haha.