Chess isn't fair - but I can fix it!

Sort:
Flyingcowking

If you want Black to win more often, just have me play as white.  Problem solved.

atomichicken
Humness wrote:

Life is unfair deal with it, chess is already as fair as it can possibly be, someone has to initiate a move, why not let it be white, that’s just the way it is

Everything else in chess is far fairer than any other game I have ever encountered, sixteen pieces each with each piece positioned with symmetrical correspondence to opponents' pieces and each piece having the same move pattern with equal power. 90 year olds can play with 10 year olds.

If anything, I am surprised chess games give the amount of actual results they do (e.g. 1-0 or 0-1), theoretically 99.99% games should be draws, with maybe 0.01% win for white as it does start first and that is at times an advantage (how can you lose to someone with the same 'army' as you? perplexing..."). Other than that chess is a very fair game - wait didn't I already say that.


People like to have a joke, deal with it.

Capanegro

Electrified board, metal pieces for white. Will constantly annoy white player and break their concentration.

Humness
atomichicken wrote:
Humness wrote:

Life is unfair deal with it, chess is already as fair as it can possibly be, someone has to initiate a move, why not let it be white, that’s just the way it is

Everything else in chess is far fairer than any other game I have ever encountered, sixteen pieces each with each piece positioned with symmetrical correspondence to opponents' pieces and each piece having the same move pattern with equal power. 90 year olds can play with 10 year olds.

If anything, I am surprised chess games give the amount of actual results they do (e.g. 1-0 or 0-1), theoretically 99.99% games should be draws, with maybe 0.01% win for white as it does start first and that is at times an advantage (how can you lose to someone with the same 'army' as you? perplexing..."). Other than that chess is a very fair game - wait didn't I already say that.


People like to have a joke, deal with it.


 sarcasm exists no matter how prolonged or disguised, guess what? (rhetorical), deal with it

atomichicken
Humness wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
Humness wrote:

Life is unfair deal with it, chess is already as fair as it can possibly be, someone has to initiate a move, why not let it be white, that’s just the way it is

Everything else in chess is far fairer than any other game I have ever encountered, sixteen pieces each with each piece positioned with symmetrical correspondence to opponents' pieces and each piece having the same move pattern with equal power. 90 year olds can play with 10 year olds.

If anything, I am surprised chess games give the amount of actual results they do (e.g. 1-0 or 0-1), theoretically 99.99% games should be draws, with maybe 0.01% win for white as it does start first and that is at times an advantage (how can you lose to someone with the same 'army' as you? perplexing..."). Other than that chess is a very fair game - wait didn't I already say that.


People like to have a joke, deal with it.


 sarcasm exists no matter how prolonged or disguised, guess what? (rhetorical), deal with it


lol You weren't being sarcastic, you just didn't understand that it was not supposed to be taken seriously like many others.

Omegaile

You should make black always sit nearest to the moon! This way, the lunar energy and the cosmos would benefict black, making the percentage exatally the same!(in the case of games with more than 12 hours, you should consider moving the chairs)

wealybinn

I am still confused with how moving pieces with your left-hand is a disadvantage?

grensley

A sweet chess variant would be that anytime (before you move), you may switch teams with the other player.

Humness
atomichicken wrote:
Humness wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
Humness wrote:

Life is unfair deal with it, chess is already as fair as it can possibly be, someone has to initiate a move, why not let it be white, that’s just the way it is

Everything else in chess is far fairer than any other game I have ever encountered, sixteen pieces each with each piece positioned with symmetrical correspondence to opponents' pieces and each piece having the same move pattern with equal power. 90 year olds can play with 10 year olds.

If anything, I am surprised chess games give the amount of actual results they do (e.g. 1-0 or 0-1), theoretically 99.99% games should be draws, with maybe 0.01% win for white as it does start first and that is at times an advantage (how can you lose to someone with the same 'army' as you? perplexing..."). Other than that chess is a very fair game - wait didn't I already say that.


People like to have a joke, deal with it.


 sarcasm exists no matter how prolonged or disguised, guess what? (rhetorical), deal with it


lol You weren't being sarcastic, you just didn't understand that it was not supposed to be taken seriously like many others.


 aite, guilty has charged

accord2

i think this is the craziest forum ive ever read. and the fact that people are coming up with some ideas in a serious manner is just lunacy. when was the last time the rules were changed? i d k    but people have been playing like this for a very long time. dude just learn some better moves , and positions for black and get serious . i honestly thought this whole thing was a joke  O M G get serious.

artfizz
accord2 wrote:

i think this is the craziest forum ive ever read. and the fact that people are coming up with some ideas in a serious manner is just lunacy. when was the last time the rules were changed? i d k    ...


Probably 6 months ago. The next rule changes are scheduled for 1 July 2009.

pushwood

let black go first, the big babyUndecided

Nelso_125

*Sigh* That is why in most tournaments, you play an equal number of games playing white, and black.

inotgramps

180 degree rotating board. White moves first...black second. Then board rotates and the Black player has the White peices in front of him...and...trys to make what he thinks are the worst moves for the White peices. The White player then does the same with the Black peices in front of him. After this the board rotates back to normal for move ( 3 )...with the White player trying to make the best move...and...the Black player trying the same on move...( 3 ). Just keep repeating this procedure.

kco

that pretty cool idea inotgramps.

artfizz
Beast719 wrote:

Through my intensive study of the statistics of chess games played in the last 100 years I have discovered a loophole in the game that leaves it fundamentally flawed. 

White wins more games than black does. This can't be fair.  I have a couple of suggestions:

...

Any other suggestions to help make this game (that we all love) fairer will be gratefully received.


I think you overlook a more fundamental inequity: better players win more games than worse ones.

Chessroshi

cows win 57 out of 100 when facing chickens, but only 48 out of 100 when facing pigs, can someone please help me rectify this barnyard dilemma?

artfizz
Chessroshi wrote:

cows win 57 out of 100 when facing chickens, but only 48 out of 100 when facing pigs, can someone please help me rectify this barnyard dilemma?


Not without knowing how pigs fare against chickens. Pigs ought to gain the upper trotter - if breakfast has anything to do with it.

rooperi
Chessroshi wrote:

cows win 57 out of 100 when facing chickens, but only 48 out of 100 when facing pigs, can someone please help me rectify this barnyard dilemma?


I think every time it's the chiken's turn to move it wants to cross the road.

Hylke

DUDE THIS ISN'T COOL R U SAYIN THAT BLCK PLYRS RWORSE DEN WITE??!??!? THAT IS JST RACIST!!!