Chess will never be solved, here's why

No because I have no reason to respect you. Give me reasons you dislike my ideas and if I respect you after you do that, I'll write you some code.

In that case, either you don't understand research or you're dishonest. Wait, we know you're thick and we know you're dishonest.

Let me give you a hint. Enter the opposite from your belief into a search engine, look at what ALL the links are saying and try to criticise them honestly.

Then criticise the criticism you came up with.
Then do it the other way round.

I understand research quite a bit better than you do. Especially online. None of that matters. We're still left with the bald-faced reality: you claimed a million dead from lockdown measures, and cannot justify or support your claim in even the smallest degree.

You claimed you were a knowledgeable programmer, and even said you would like me to prove it if you weren't. When I asked some questions, you pretended the exchange never happened. You cannot justify or support your claim in even the smallest degree.

You claim that chess is a forced draw with perfect play. You cannot justify or support your claim in even the smallest degree.

You claim that some posters are alts of other posters and that they conspire against you. You cannot justify or support your claim in even the smallest degree.

Are you picking up on the pattern here?

As for "get bent", you might be but I'm not that way inclined.

toddler.attitude++;

it is widely believed that chess is a forced draw with perfect play as we know so far.

Yes, it is widely believed, not claimed as if proven. Thus the differing definitions of the words belief vs. claim.

you do javascript?

it actually has been proven with the engines we have. play a game of chess stockfish vs stockfish. it will eventually lead to a draw

Not anymore, but that syntax works in several languages.

You probably ought to skim the previous 500+ pages before you start down this road.

You probably ought to skim the previous 500+ pages before you start down this road.

do tell what on earth happened while i was gone, and how yall started arguing

That you can read on your own...I am talking about making statements like "chess is a proven draw because Stockfish draws itself".

i say stockfish because it is the strongest thing we can get

i say stockfish because it is the strongest thing we can get

It's one of the strongest engines, currently, but it's not the perfect chess player.

The argument could easily be made that it simply can't convert the advantage white starts with effectively enough.

yes that is why i said it's the strongest we can get, so, what i said a page ago, SO FAR, chess is a draw with perfect play

Two things:

One: Stockfish isn't the strongest we can get. It's the strongest that currently exists, and stronger versions will continue to be released.

Two: Stockfish isn't perfect play; you can't say that chess is a draw with perfect play because the current strongest engine draws against itself. You can only say that once an engine that does play perfectly exists, if it draws against itself.

that is why i said so far