Chess will never be solved, here's why

@11872

"Engines are flawed and are not evaluating for perfect play"
++ That is what I say the whole time.
The provisional, heuristic engine evaluations like +0.33 play NO ROLE.
Only the end result matters: a draw by either the 7-men endgame table base,
or a prior 3-fold repetition, or a known drawn position.
We have 108 sequences of average 39 moves ending in draws.

Weakly solving Chess requires 1 way to draw after 1 e4 and 1 way after 1 d4.
We have not 1, but 4 ways to draw after 1 e4:

1. 1 e4 e6
2. 1 e4 c5
3. 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nf6
4. 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6

We have not 1, but 5 ways to draw after 1 d4:

1. 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6
2. 1 d4 Nf6 3 c4 g6
3. 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6
4. 1 d4 d5 2 c4 dxc4
5. 1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6

This redundancy makes it fail safe.
Even if a pair of errors were found in one line of defense, then still 3-4 backup lines are available.

Someone actually accused me of down voting because someone else down voted all the comments even tho I didn't lol

I be tired is tygxc though because it happens on other threads for me it is like 50/50

how much time do you spend writing all of this?

ask DDue. hed be the one to ans this.

This is for optimissed not you lmao

i know right BC665 ?...3rd ppl in are such wimps !

heres another ex..."Only according to yourself." (Doofus DDue)

huh ??...no not at all Opti. u fight like a guy would-should imo .

A whole week, huh?

There's not a shred of anything in that diatribe to warrant showing to anyone in mathematics. There's two numbers, 108 and 100, neither of which are used in any way a 9 year old couldn't understand.

Meanwhile, the end result of your long, meandering journey is that your answer to the subject line of this thread is effectively "Yes, chess will never be solved.".

Go back a page, skim the posts for length and who made them, and ponder why your assertion makes no sense. Your patriarchal Don Quixote has the longest post by a country mile. Now go back several weeks...you will find I am well behind a handful of posters in terms of lengthy posts. In fact, your erstwhile hero has been complaining about it, that I am not talking on topic.

You two never are much for logic, and just grab whatever insulting assertion is closest to hand, whether believable or not.

Dio uses bigger words than you do

The fact that you think that diatribe was worth showing to anyone in any academic or professional setting just highlights how utterly incapable of judging such things you are. You don't know what clever is, and you don't know what brightness is, you only know whether people agree with you or not.

You use small words against big words

Kinda silly when you try to trash talk with small brain comments right ?

Lol, that's your attempted pivot? That your diatribe was "on topic"? Did someone say it wasn't? Tacitly admitting I was right about the lack of any real content is useful and bodes well for the fact that you can still perceive reality on occasion, so thanks for that.

Bigger words are more annoying though

They are extravagant

Careful, if you add just one or two more animals to your farcical list, you're going to forgot which is which...unless you are keeping a list on file, which would be hilarious.

Demonstrate one "complex" idea anywhere in that post.

Jealous hamster trolling hmmm never heard of it

This poster listens to the Howard Stern show, a juvenile radio offering that appeals to the lowest common denominator. Bababooey is about your speed, though, so I'm not surprised you would be amused.

.

The point is you can't do it, and you know it. Run through the whole thing, pick out anything you like and try to explain in depth why it's an interesting or complex idea. I will happily take it apart in minutes. You've already skimmed your post and realized you have nothing to offer, so you rely on the same tired excuse you make every time somebody asks you to drill down on something ridiculous you have said...you pretend you are above it all and that nobody can fathom your thought processes (which is true, at some level, but not in the way you would like to believe...).

Amusing as it is, watching you run away anytime your feet are being held to the fire starts to lose its appeal after a decade.