@9448
"current analysis INDICATES that g4 loses"
++ That are weasel words. It either loses, draws, or wins. In this case 1 g4? loses.
That is also the lingo of Fischer and Caruana for other positions: 'it loses by force'.
Losing by force may take 60 moves, but is inevitable.
I like watching tygxc down vote all my posts hehehe
@9452
"he's been very anti blitz he tried it last week"
++ I still believe blitz is worthless for progress. I also believe increment is good.
I used to be good at over the board 5|0 blitz, occasionally beating masters and even a grandmaster at it, but I am too slow now. I play 10|0, with officially is blitz. I tried 15|10, 10|5, 5|5, 5|3, but got no pairings, so I played some 3|2. Maybe I can still get 2000 in it.
@9447
"i havent found a single one that agrees with literally any of your disagreements with me"
++ Then you talked to the wrong math majors.
"how about you go talk to a mathematician" ++ I know more math than your majors.
funny how you refuse to provide your math education, nor do you address how its literally brought up to published mathematicians.
"++ Then you talked to the wrong math majors."
ive been actively looking bro. not a single person agrees with you. I just talked to another today, he laughed at you and said that you have no idea what rigor is required for proof. so, please find me the right math major. and no, random quotes taken out of context dont count.
@9458
"brought up to published mathematicians"
++ What published mathematicians? Where are their comments?
@9459
"not a single person agrees with you"
++ Their fault, not mine. I try to patiently explain as clearly as I can, but that is all I can do.
@9458
"brought up to published mathematicians"
++ What published mathematicians? Where are their comments?
im a math major at a university do you not think i have access to published mathematicians?
they completely agreed with everything (pertaining to mathematical proof) that ive said, and while they were much more polite about it, they basically called you [not intelligent] and in serious need of basic math proof education.
@9448
"current analysis INDICATES that g4 loses"
++ That are weasel words. It either loses, draws, or wins. In this case 1 g4? loses.
That is also the lingo of Fischer and Caruana for other positions: 'it loses by force'.
Losing by force may take 60 moves, but is inevitable.
bro calls the difference between an analysis and a full proof "weasel words"
@9448
"current analysis INDICATES that g4 loses"
++ That are weasel words. It either loses, draws, or wins. In this case 1 g4? loses.
That is also the lingo of Fischer and Caruana for other positions: 'it loses by force'.
Losing by force may take 60 moves, but is inevitable.
bro calls the difference between an analysis and a full proof "weasel words"
I 100% wouldn't trust Fischer on anything. Good player but too many buts.
Wait long squash got muted
Sadness
@9448
"current analysis INDICATES that g4 loses"
++ That are weasel words. It either loses, draws, or wins. In this case 1 g4? loses.
That is also the lingo of Fischer and Caruana for other positions: 'it loses by force'.
Losing by force may take 60 moves, but is inevitable.
bro calls the difference between an analysis and a full proof "weasel words"
I 100% wouldn't trust Fischer on anything. Good player but too many buts.
LOL i needed that, thank you.
I can't tell if I agree or disagree with tygxc since he won't answer my questions. I want a game with 1. g4 ... d5 2. e3
Didn't he get muted cause he went to far talking about racism ?
Wait long squash got muted
Sadness
yeah, I miss his nonsense tbh. tygxc's nonsense is not as interesting
could you give me some recommendations for long squash moments?
Maybe the instine buda,Elon on chess=useless
lol lexiii
@9448
"current analysis INDICATES that g4 loses"
++ That are weasel words. It either loses, draws, or wins. In this case 1 g4? loses.
That is also the lingo of Fischer and Caruana for other positions: 'it loses by force'.
Losing by force may take 60 moves, but is inevitable.
bro calls the difference between an analysis and a full proof "weasel words"
The weasel words: "all of the posts in this forum strongly suggest that @tygxc doesn't know what it means to solve a game"
The elite GM version: "@tygxc definitely doesn't know what it means to solve a game"
@9447
"i havent found a single one that agrees with literally any of your disagreements with me"
++ Then you talked to the wrong math majors.
"how about you go talk to a mathematician" ++ I know more math than your majors.