On the second comment, @tygxc said that chess hasn't been solved yet
On the seventh, he said it's a draw
what?
Well spotted.
But then you'll see he tried to qualify it by posting different definitions of 'weakly solved' and that terminology is the gremlin at the center of much of the discussion here.
tygxc tries to maintain that 'perfect games' exist and that they resulted in a draw because they were 'perfect'.
That is Disinformation.
Bobby Fischer suggested publically to the effect that 'if nobody makes a mistake the game ends in a draw'
but that is misleading because 'if nobody makes a mistake' is an Abbreviation of the actual reality.
The actual reality is:
'If neither player makes a big enough mistake that is both detected and exploited sufficiently for a win by the opponent - or neither player makes a mistake that is otherwise sufficiently exploited for a win by the opponent or that otherwise leads to a loss for the player making the big enough mistake - then obviously the game ends in a draw Unless somebody's flag falling on their chess Clock also results in 'not a draw' too or instead'
That's the actual reality. Happens constantly all over the world.
-----------------------------------------------
And there's another Gremlin about terminology there too.
In that second case - word phrasing that is meant as an abbreviation resulting in saying something else and spreading disinformation.
The continuing improvement of engines indicates there aren't any known 'perfect' games because tomorrow's engines are finding wins (in other words 'mistakes') that yesterday's engines didn't find.
But tygxc will keep pushing his disinformation that there are 'known' perfect games and pretend that that 'proves' his Disinformation that 'chess is a draw with optimal play'.
Which would mislead beginner and novice players and other players.
@tygxc I really dont get how you can stomach KNOWING that you're wrong and deciding to purposefully mislead others anyways. Is it like what playerafar conjectures and you just want the attention? Or do you get a sick kick out of seeing people take your lies seriously?
there's also the possibility that you are just profoundly deluded and uneducated. but at the same time, if you were just uneducated, you would respond to people doing basic corrections to your claims, and I know that you've seen my retellings of how I've brought up your "logic" to math professors and got chided for even bothering with someone as stupid as you are. Do you think I just made it up?
Hi MEGA
when considering tygxc's motivations including the ones you and I have mentioned ...
such motivations are usually not exclusive of each other.
In other words and/or instead of just 'or'.
A or B. Or both.
And if more than two - possibly all.
It may seem that one might knock out another as a possibility ...
but with the internal psyche of those who don't care whether they believe themselves or not and thereby 'lose track' of that - there's typically internal oscillations and vacillations and cycles regarding how much they believe of their nonsense.
Its a transient situation.
And it shows as whoever trolling/disinforming moves around a clock face of different retorts and tactics.
Which can take weeks or days or even just minutes - to move around that dial.
----------------------------------
With tygxc though - while he's pushing his disinfo - he's never that far from the forum topic plus he's minimally personal.
O - that's @Optimissed - is much much worse.
tygxc's posts appear to reflect that he wants the discussions to be about the forum subject - even as he also obviously wants it to be about his disinformation regarding same.
whereas O basically wants the discussions to be about O personally and everyone else personally too especially those who disagree with or criticize O.
In other words O trolls constantly and in ways almost all members know to not do.
That is O's life's work.
---------------------------------------
O was 'badly damaged' (because of his fragile delicate nature) in a recent exchange in this forum a few days ago).
But instead of then getting himself muted by chess.com for a third recent time ..
(desperately and pathetically needing to go 'far over the top' in retorting)
this time he instead averted that and simply took a break for a few days.
Something he needs to learn to do regularly.
Something fester told him to do.