Chess will never be solved, here's why

How did u know though?

His posts are gone from all the forums I have seen him posting in recently. His posts will come back when his mute is over.

Just can't imagine why that keeps happening. Perhaps it is the cartel?

Ah ok

Huh?

the mexican cartel

Inside joke for posters that have been around for a long time. Optimissed believes that there is a cartel of trolls controlling the forums, and that a group of rogue mods are in on it, and that he is the sole crusader that is capable enough to bring this organization down...so, it causes flak to fly his way sometimes.

Bruh, [Removed]

Also, i’ve only been on this thread like 2-3 weeks ago, so thank you.

So tygxc, when are you actually going to attempt to justify your claims instead of going around in circles?

chess will solve it self.

It's the chess speaks for itself not solve itself

Since when could pieces play on their own 🤔

tygxc definitely makes circular arguments.
That's already established.
But consider it from a 'verdict' standpoint.
The client is 'chess is not solved'.
If 'guilt' is solved then the prosecution has to prove that 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
tygxc will try to maintain there's 'no reasonable doubt' so you must find 'guilty'.
-----------------------
But there's far more than enough reasonable doubt.
The growth in the percentage of draws - especially with the top engines - is very attributable to a list of other factors that tygxc refuses to properly address.
1) the programming and power of the very top engines wouldn't vary much -
2) five days per move isn't enough for the engines to find errors in their lookaheads because of their 'horizon' limitations and because of the way they're programmed.
3) does anybody here claim to know exactly how they're programmed?
Computer programs evolve.
When new programs are written - does the programmer always go through the entire spaghetti code of the previous program?
You'd find there aren't enough years in a lifetime.
Instead - he writes a new program.
Whether using elements of the old one or not.
4) Chess is not table-based solved except for seven pieces or less.
Therefore the computers are not playing perfect games.
Because games start with 32 pieces.
Not 7.
------------------------
No establishment of perfect games means the client is innocent.
tygxc doesn't even have enough evidence for 'indictment' let alone 'prosecution'.
His claim is circular ...
'a lot of consecutive draws so the games 'must be perfect' and then arguments about 'error pairs' that are subject to definitions of errors as opposed to inferior play and horizons and time per move.
You can have a draw with two errors by one side and one error by the other.
Whether the errors are blunders or simply inferior play to 'solved' play or failure to punish inferior play.
The notion that it would have to be 'pairs' in order to get a draw is Snake Oil.
Snake Oil for a 'frame'.

'It would have to be 'consecutive error pairs' or a series of games with 'error pairs' to end up with all draws.'
No it wouldn't. See previous post.

back in my day if you wanted to learn pysichs you had to ask newton himself.

back in my day i used to walk up a hill BOTH WAYS, AT THE SAME TIME! its because physichs werent invented yet.

Ask Newton himself?
That was in the days before Bounty Paper Towels.
And before Einstein.
And before the Empire.

You must have had interstellar travel then.
To bring such science to earth.
Most impressive and fascinating.
Can your spaceship computer solve chess Instantly?

what is a computer!?

Something that computes.
Doesn't breathe.
Doesn't like Twinkies or McDonald's food.
Doesn't like health food either.
----------------------------
But do they make money?. For 'somebody' else?
Does 'chess cannot be solved' make money?
I think so but not sure.
For people on that computer project. Apparently. Its funded.
Even though they don't.
They don't solve it.

Back in my day we could float to mars BOTH WAYS, AT THE SAME TIME! Because physichs werent invented yet.