Chess will never be solved, here's why

You've already lost that debate. It's not complicated - you don't know his IQ, you don't believe his claims are credible - it's an opinion. If you're still confused go read about skepticism.

Keep trying

Addressing your edit here, I will just say that you are overreaching at this point.

You obviously understand quite well that when somebody is (already dubiously and fallaciously) claiming victory in various discussions, supposedly due to demonstrably superior intellect, that the lynchpins of such an argument require that the claims actually manage to hold up beyond the level of self-proclamation and personal arrogance.

Back to unilateral claims and your "keep trying" catch phrase, I see...that's how I know when you've exhausted your ammo. Better luck in future.

For most of human history the overwhelming majority of people, including religious "authorities", believed that the Earth was flat, at the center of the universe, and the sun, moon, and stars revolved around us, travelling under the Earth at night to reappear in the east the next morning. Do you believe this was true for all those millenia, and the cosmos underwent a reconfiguration a few centuries ago? Or is it possible that popular religions reflect the mistaken opinions of their adherents?

I don't know if I would go that far, but I will say that when see him write "keep trying", I can imagine a cartoon-ish voice saying "Exit, stage left"...

Translation of C-Rat's recent posts. He has lost. Is caught. Exposed.
He's now trying to do damage control but it isn't working.
C-Rat also doesnt get it that when whoever constantly tells false posts as he does - that there's no way to hold it together.
Dio actually never had to prove Opto's IQ claims were false ... the point is Opto trying to use IQ claims as points of argument in other subjects.
This went right over C-Rat's head as he keeps repeating that same mistake over and over again.
He's also continuing to attend to my posts - contradicting what he was saying a very few minutes ago.

https://www.chess.com/play/tournament/5491815

Here's some info about arrogance and discourtesy among titled chess players ....
but first -
its ironic that Opto and C-Rat have the arrogance and discourtesy
but without the titles!

'Arrogance and discourtesy among titled chess players can be a significant issue, often stemming from a combination of their deep passion for the game and the competitive nature of chess. Here are some insights:
Arrogance in Chess: Some titled players exhibit arrogance due to their high level of skill and the intense emotional investment they have in the game. This can manifest as overconfidence or a sense of entitlement, leading to condescending behavior towards less experienced players.
Competitive Advantage: There may be a competitive advantage to appearing arrogant, as it can intimidate opponents and boost one's own confidence. This is similar to other individual sports where mental toughness and belief in one's superiority can influence the outcome.
--------------------------
Personal Experiences: Beginners and lower-rated players often report encountering titled players who are condescending or rude. This can create a hostile environment, especially in local chess clubs, where the culture can vary significantly'

I might be the most active commentator in the opening section of this forum and have studied it almost exclusively since I started, I have not even started on studying the endgame or midgame yet, hence the skew that you see there. This is something I have spoken about many times before. It's why I can confidently out-debate 2300s on the opening, but still I'm only rated 1950. So yes, my knowledge of the opening far outstrips the other aspects of my play - for now.

I simply am taking a progressive systematic approach to learning the game. That is my style. You would know nothing about it...

What you are is a good example of what happens when a feeble minded person is given an AI tool and presented with lots of statistics which they're incapable of interpreting in an intelligent way.

Now, I think cheating accusations are against the rules - so keep it up and you might find yourself moderated.

It's a completely abstract and unrelated argument. I can give you an example about how the pioneers used to treat infections with colloidal silver before microscopes were invented. Neither my example nor yours would say anything about divination, the existence of God, or any number of other things religious. The claim the earth is flat is not even in any major religious texts. Infact, most of these religious texts predated the scientific revolution and weren't even written with respect to a scientific materialist viewpoint. Even so, you're naturally approaching this topic from a philosophical standpoint, but my claim with respect to divination is not a primarily philosophical claim and never has been. So it's actually just a totally irrelevant debate you're trying to start here. 
I could not care less if you have an atheist materialist worldview, this matter has been debated a million times before, the conclusion is always completely pre-determined in the minds of those involved, it's never very interesting. 
Keep trying

The point is that the fact that 88% of the population might have some belief that unverified speculations are true is no strong proof that they actually are. You used that statistic to buttress Opti's statements that he does have psychic abilities (that he never bothered to develop), and accuse others of unfairly challenging his assertion.

@DiogenesDue - one slight error by me in a recent post.
My mistake. I fixed it with the edit button.
----------------
and C-Rat now trying to threaten members.
Like what Opto has done so many times.

Yes.
C-Rat is apparently superstitious among his other failings.
That would make him an easy recruit for Opto.
Opto 'believes' his own remarks about psi abilities? Probably not.
But he has so little regard for honesty that he probably loses track.
I've seen signs of that many times from people who troll.
They stop caring and therefore stop knowing whether they believe their own nonsense or not!

98% of children love cartoons. Therefore cartoons are real.

For adults, I would recommend Pantheon.

May I introduce you to the notion of irony?

"Optimissed - notion of irony.

Notion of irony - Optimissed. "

(I am not 100% sure you will be friends).

Also, my specialisation was mathematically analysis, although at post-grad level fields tend to overlap. For example measure theory and functional analysis find natural common ground, and measure theory is the foundation of calculus and also key to probability theory, which is more my subject than statistics.

As for simplicity, have you understood my posts on the probability theory of infinite sequences of IID boolean random variables yet? (Rhetorical question).

Wanna elaborate how that score is calculated? The 250% score in opening theory is a comparison to what exactly? Does it consider that some play only one opening that might be easier to memorize than some other line?

Fictional narratives bolded above.

There's no "status" in debunking your delusions...it's rather easy and a tedious chore, frankly. Many posters do it, presumably as kind of a public service when they see you spouting off. You're a nasty piece of work, and that tends to draw a diversified communal effort.

Nobody really cares about your games. That's why they sit there in the threads you post them in like stones in a riverbed...the water has to flow around them, but other than that they serve no particular purpose.

We've been through this before when you were buddies with Noodle, chess.com's resident flat earther. You can't really detect the earth's curvature at 5,000ft with the naked eye. In the past it would require a theodolite to detect, even at the highest elevations reachable sans flying.

Naturally, you argued at the time that your superhumanly keen eyesight allowed you to personally see the curvature at the top of hills without any instrumentation. It's amazing what conformation bias will allow one to perceive if they are willing to abandon reason.

Go ahead and upload as many games as you like. It's not like you have anything better to spend your time on.

Just more proof of your lunacy. Didn't bother with the game.