Chomping on hanging pieces will improve your chess

Let's play right now then, best out of 31 bullet match loser closes their account.

Doss beating me in a bullet match proves you're arguments are right? Ofc not, the only way to settle this is an argument, not some chess match. You already know I get smoked instantly in a bullet match against you, but in an argument, you get smoked by almost everyone. If you want to proves Stern's mute is unfair, maybe provide some reasons, not "beat me in a chess match", that doesn't prove anything.

My argument holds more water because my rating is higher than yours.

**yawn**
this is getting very tired now.

Yet that rating is leafy af

*leaky I meant.

I'm just not gonna worry about it. Why argue? I know he cheats. He knows he cheats. That's all that matters. Bye

goodluck having any social connections with smartsocial people then

Still waiting for the proof. continual baseless accusations will result in a block to protect the thread from being closed.

Your argument holds absolutely nothing. What does rating have to do with being a troll? If you're high-rated but a troll, then you're a troll, but if you're low-rated but not a troll, you're not a troll. If you're not a troll, then why do you support Janko?

generally the argument is related to winning chess games, and I'm better at winning than you are.

In reality you're just a ChomperHangingPieces

Ok, that is true but settling an argument like chess is rigged by a chess match does not make sense.

Well looks like your fanboy, @mike_ox6942, got banned

And the funny thing is that he's a cheater.

what does this mean? chomping?

The guy started to win every game and stacked up some 99% scores as well. Not everyone has the most sophisticated methods to cheat.

Chomper should've helped him out with the techniques

It's just saying the obvious - if your opponent hangs a piece, most likely the best move is to just take it. It's nothing deep.

Thank you for the response.

It is simple but maybe I am not good at it haha