CLEAN rook sacrifice; Is There Hope For Me To Reach 1700+?

Judging by this game, can I get some constructive criticism and feedback? I feel like it went really well, and I want to know what kind of rating I would reach if I continued to play like this.

Accuracy: 86.8

you can go as far as u want

Weeeeeellll I need the skill for it

im 1700 and the main suggestion i would give you is just don't make blunders, and if you're playing rapid or classical to always think long term when making moves (not saying don't think when playing blitz/bullet but in rapid it is much more important.

Really nice find! Not that many players at your level would consider saccing a rook to start applying pressure on white's queenside.

hey man i am so proud of you and you are going to get their i gust wish i could be a 700 bt i am bad at game

that game gave me a seizure, maybe you should

learn your openings

see basic hanging pieces (pawns)

be a bit more agressive and dont just sit back when the npc decides to play the london

six pack of flabs i recommend you get advice from master level players compared to people at your level or below, they have been at your level before and could be more of a help

What 'basic hanging pieces' did I miss?

And how did the game almost give you a seizure, he played at 80% accuracy, and I played at 86%

your opening was trash (you should learn some)

you missed the options your opponent had

and you sat around like a bum letting your oppoment get his easy london where you allowed him to auto pilot for the opening

you should learn how to be challening not just sit back and let white try to do something

white also played bad but still

Are you viewing the right game? White never castled and I sacrificed a rook so I could attack?

Also when is 80% and 85% accuracy bad?

I asked for constructive criticism not insults.

If you are going to tell me I did something wrong, please include what I did wrong and how I can fix it, instead of just calling it 'bad'

That's how someone improves

that was a false brilliant, you didint have much of an attack and white is still better

white was just bad and people tend to get higher accuracy agianst bad players

ive had 95% accuracy because i knew how to punish a bad move in an opening i knew well and won

accuracy does not mean much, its just your moves compared to the computers which says nothing about skill and opening

??? what are yall on about

"If you are going to tell me I did something wrong, please include what I did wrong and how I can fix it, instead of just calling it 'bad'"

So. Where in that reply was this addressed?

your opening in gereral was bad and obviously you didint really know what you were doing

and you play moves to make your position better or because there is a point behind it. not just because ¨i dunno what to play rn imma just play Rb8 and do nothing¨

that is what i said good job noticing