I think you'd ALL agree that cheating at chess is bad, but if there's one thing that is even worse, one thing that makes cheating PALE in comparison, one thing that violates every internet code of ethics, it's correcting someone's spelling or grammar as FRAPPALO did mine. What a low blow. The spelling/grammar police ilk have been shown to possess no debatorial skills, have no original ideas ever to come forth from their brain, and to be nothing more than the 97 lb. internet weakling. FRAP, I COMMAND you to bring something more to the table than running your Microsoft Word Spell/Grammar check on everything I write. Capeche?
Come see me cheat....Live....if you're smart enough
Sort:
Feb 24, 2008
0
#23
Assuming that you'll be cheating, it sounds like you have a partner in crime. Makes me wonder if that person plays here too.
More than likely he does have a partner, and if so they are quite cunning, devious, and smart!
wow, this is all quite entertaining to read.
Feb 24, 2008
0
#26
cheater_1 wrote:
I will be attempting my 3rd cheating attempt at an official USCF public chess event in the next several weeks.
How did the first two attempts work out for you?
I think somebody needs a life.
cheater_1 wrote:
Clue #1 (the easiest clue of them all): A honey bee flew up to a mule and said: "can you please show me where Hawthorne went to."
Dude, you're sooo cool. Like wow, you read about genius's like you in old books and fairy tales, but here you are! Like a modern day riddler or the unibomber, except you don't have a lot of money or ever get laid. But still! Awesome to the max, I hope you enjoy your latest attempt at muted glory and masturbating to chess footage afterwards.
cheater_1 wrote:
I think you'd ALL agree that cheating at chess is bad, but if there's one thing that is even worse, one thing that makes cheating PALE in comparison, one thing that violates every internet code of ethics, it's correcting someone's spelling or grammar as FRAPPALO did mine. What a low blow. The spelling/grammar police ilk have been shown to possess no debatorial skills, have no original ideas ever to come forth from their brain, and to be nothing more than the 97 lb. internet weakling. FRAP, I COMMAND you to bring something more to the table than running your Microsoft Word Spell/Grammar check on everything I write. Capeche?
It's capisce.
Mar 6, 2008
0
#30
jlaix wrote: cheater_1 wrote:
Clue #1 (the easiest clue of them all): A honey bee flew up to a mule and said: "can you please show me where Hawthorne went to."
Dude, you're sooo cool. Like wow, you read about genius's like you in old books and fairy tales, but here you are! Like a modern day riddler or the unibomber, except you don't have a lot of money or ever get laid. But still! Awesome to the max, I hope you enjoy your latest attempt at muted glory and masturbating to chess footage afterwards.
This may have been one of the more nasty images I've encountered in some time.
cheater_1 wrote:
Clue #1 (the easiest clue of them all): A honey bee flew up to a mule and said: "can you please show me where Hawthorne went to."
as in hawthorne hights the band?
cheater_1 wrote:
I think you'd ALL agree that cheating at chess is bad, but if there's one thing that is even worse, one thing that makes cheating PALE in comparison, one thing that violates every internet code of ethics, it's correcting someone's spelling or grammar as FRAPPALO did mine. What a low blow. The spelling/grammar police ilk have been shown to possess no debatorial skills, have no original ideas ever to come forth from their brain, and to be nothing more than the 97 lb. internet weakling. FRAP, I COMMAND you to bring something more to the table than running your Microsoft Word Spell/Grammar check on everything I write. Capeche?
If there was such a thing as professional hypocrism, no doubt you'd be billionaire by now. I expect you to be intelligent enough to understand why I'm quoting that, cheater_1, because your intellect is so large, all other forum topics are fluff and drivel in comparison.
Chessroshi wrote:
You guys can find him easy, he'll be the one with mum in tow in the station wagon, running the mission impossible computing centre.
"Dang it mom, i'm not giving you any more pop tarts unless you stop calling it 'the little horsie' piece. Yes....yes.....I'll give pop back his hearing aide, will you just wait a sec, please. I'm trying to win internet fame here.... and the $25 place prize."
Hahahahhahahhah
Nice one
And patheticness by cheater_1...arrogant jerk...
http://main.uschess.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=199
http://main.uschess.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=199
I went onto www.uschess.org, searched kentucky and missouri, two most common results. Meh, if he's stupid enough to try it, they'll catch him.
I just lolled at this. Hands down, this has the potential to be a funny yet active forum topic. I applaud at the brilliance, nevermind the validity of what he's actually saying. I guess I'll take a rain-check for now and read up on what everyone else says when I come back and maybe it'll be even funnier.
cheater_1 wrote:
I think you'd ALL agree that cheating at chess is bad, but if there's one thing that is even worse, one thing that makes cheating PALE in comparison, one thing that violates every internet code of ethics, it's correcting someone's spelling or grammar as FRAPPALO did mine. What a low blow. The spelling/grammar police ilk have been shown to possess no debatorial skills, have no original ideas ever to come forth from their brain, and to be nothing more than the 97 lb. internet weakling. FRAP, I COMMAND you to bring something more to the table than running your Microsoft Word Spell/Grammar check on everything I write. Capeche?
Haha, can't help myself but debatorial's not a word!
I'm just kidding. I believe there's also a Hawthorne in California?
I'll be using the restroom somewhere in the continental U.S. at some point and attempting to do things that are anatomically impossible. Only the pluckiest of sleuths will decipher my whereabouts and what it is I will be doing...
I am afraid we must realize, this is just a game. He is plaing his game and he wants more players to join... as easy as that. He will not really attemp to win the event since he would be obviously catched. I think it is all about trying something stupid, meaningless and not so easy, but having fun in the meantime.
If you ever wished to be a spy, but you are just a salesman.. this is a way to add some exitment to your life.
Mar 23, 2008
0
#39
IM so sorry but I CANNOT reveal any more clues to my whereabouts. I am devastated at this setback. You see, ONCE AGAIN, the staff who operates this website chooses to engage in UNAMERICAN CENSORSHIP. They have gagged me and prohibited me from advertising any more clues to my whereabouts at the USCF event. How RUDE! This website is going down the toilet faster and faster--the reason for my infrequent posts. They choose the content based on their personal opinions (dangerous)--can anyone say FOX NEWS. Besides, what is so corrupting about posts that give out clues as to where I'll be?
I feel beaten down. A slave to the MAN.
Anyway, what's your favorite piece, the horse or the castle?
cheater_1 wrote:
IM so sorry but I CANNOT reveal any more clues to my whereabouts. I am devastated at this setback. You see, ONCE AGAIN, the staff who operates this website chooses to engage in UNAMERICAN CENSORSHIP. They have gagged me and prohibited me from advertising any more clues to my whereabouts at the USCF event. How RUDE! This website is going down the toilet faster and faster--the reason for my infrequent posts. They choose the content based on their personal opinions (dangerous)--can anyone say FOX NEWS. Besides, what is so corrupting about posts that give out clues as to where I'll be?
I feel beaten down. A slave to the MAN.
Anyway, what's your favorite piece, the horse or the castle?
It's not unamerican, the staff of this site have the right to allow or disallow anything they want on this site. And in fact, they are more lenient than others. I know of a site that allows only discussion that is directly related to chess or the site on their formus. If any other topic comes up, it is removed quickly and unceremoniously. On that site, you would have been banned from posting a LONG time ago (please note, I'm not necessarily saying that you should be here, I don't like the way that site does things, Im just saying that's the way it is there). You may say it is draconian perhaps, but the same rights that allow you to open up your own website and give all the clues you want, also allow the staff of this site to restrict the topics discussed on THEIR site.
Steps off of soapbox.
Damn you and your tricks, Carmen Sandiego!