same. a4/h4 getting the rooks out! horrible. i sometimes play beginners who do that and i squash them, of course i would squash them anyhow if they knew theory till move 20, but still!
Crappy thing you did as a total beginner
Lent my book My 60 Memorable Games by Fischer to a friend at School who never gave it back :(
Should have never have done that.
As a total beginner, I played the scholars mate. But i always took with the bishop instead of the queen. 
As a total beginner, I played the scholars mate. But i always took with the bishop instead of the queen.
haha. That's excellent.
I often remember attacking a queen with my rook when the rook was unprotected, moving the knights twice within the first 4 moves for no reason and most importantly, I gave away pieces for free 10x more often than I do now 
I remember playing pure K+R versus K+R for a while, trying to figure out a cunning way to capture his rook. Someone walked by and pointed out that whenever I threatened his rook with my own, my opponent could just capture it, but I wasn't convinced.
I remember playing pure K+R versus K+R for a while, trying to figure out a cunning way to capture his took.
Nothing annoyed me more than when someone was playing on in a K+Q vs K+Q endgame. I offered him a draw constantly. The joke was on him as I ended up skewering them and he resigned.
I remember playing pure K+R versus K+R for a while, trying to figure out a cunning way to capture his took.
Nothing annoyed me more than when someone was playing on in a K+Q vs K+Q endgame. I offered him a draw constantly. The joke was on him as I ended up skewering them and he resigned.
+10 for you, anyone that refuses a draw in a clearly drawn position deserves to have their queen captured in a skewer 
I remember playing pure K+R versus K+R for a while, trying to figure out a cunning way to capture his rook. Someone walked by and pointed out that whenever I threatened his rook with my own, my opponent could just capture it, but I wasn't convinced.
As well you should not have been... a skewer might have been possible.
Worst thing I ever did was never learn about tactics or strategy. That, and thinking 2. Qh5 was a good move.
Trying to remember every opening I play several moves deep, because who wants to risk white bleeding his slight opening advantage into a win (though with best play can whittle down to equality anyway) and as white who wouldn't want to do that?
I used to fianchetto both bishops. I didn't even know what a fianchetto was, so basically, I'm a chess genius. Actually, I played on such a low level that the reason I fianchettoed my bishops was so that if black/white made a mistake by playing b2/b6 or g2/g6 I could take a rook. Mind you, I had just learnt how the pieces move.
Most people starting out don't know the relative piece values, other than "the queen is the most powerful". I can't really remember what I did, but I'm pretty sure I would trade rooks for opponents minor pieces all the time, and make really bad pawn moves that left my king exposed.
I rejected 1.e4 as a complete beginner because it exposes the pawn to attack. Then I found out about castling then it seemed better.
When i was a beginner, I didnt know what castling was... So when some guy played it against me in my first tournament, I said to him, "Hey! You can't do that!" Then everyone nearby looked at me. Yeah, it was bad.
When I started to play chess, I always did horrible moves (well, I still do, but less horrible). Like, I always opened with a4 or h4 because I wanted to develop rook through a and h files. Then I understood that that strategy didn't work. I only knew the moves, no opening strategy, no middlegames, no endgame, no nothing. I made almost always random moves, without thinking, because I didn't know what to do. Then I read about opening strategy and piece development, and I started to understand a bit more. What about you?