Hey all you ratists (@drmrboss & @cellomaster8 the one with the 'low level chess players crap') talking down to me, here is me beating a titled player who was 2000+ -
Hey all you ratists (@drmrboss & @cellomaster8 the one with the 'low level chess players crap') talking down to me, here is me beating a titled player who was 2000+ -
DeirdreSkye is right . I have had painful experiences in Scotch gambit . These kind of sacs may work @ patzer level , but will ultimately be ground down @ higher levels .
But nice idea. The only thing is do not get addicted to this & play only...only this!
HAVE SPORTSMANSHIP & BE CHESSLY!!!
I don't get the last game. Did black lose on time? In the final position black is clearly winning. Those two free pawns don't need their king's support to promote, so black gets a queen while the a-pawn goes nowhere.
If you are not interested then why did you say, "wanna try?" in your previous post. Also save this 1900 ratist bullsh!t for someone else. I have beaten 1900 players, and I don't consider it a great achievement or anything. I have even drawn a titled player. Unless you are Magnus Carslen, or something, take the poor player crap elsewhere.