Danny Rensch Q&A: Ask Him A Question!

Sort:
Avatar of NoahChessBlue

Will c4 ever explode? Will it ever become a chess variant, also hi happy.png

Avatar of alphaous
654Psyfox wrote:

Why has chess.com not released any statements on the attack on Israel? Yall released this article supporting Ukraine on the onset of the war.

https://www.chess.com/article/view/on-the-invasion-of-ukraine

It's been nearly a month, and you all have still not released a sIdkatement, and continue to mute members who talk about it.

Seems like hypocrisy to me.

Idk, maybe it's cuz this situation is more complicated? I'm actually glad they haven't released a statement, knowing them it'd be an article blindly repeating a news outlet's opinion without full knowledge of the facts. This would require a lot more finesse than ukraine-russia (which was easier, not easy but not that hard to discuss maturely) and more people would get offended, the people here aren't mature enough for proper discussions of this matter especially because more people are less informed of this conflict than ukraine and russia.

Avatar of justbefair

I would like to know when the next improvement in the definition of "brilliant" moves will occur.

Many many people do not understand that most moves currently called "brilliant" are not "brilliant" at all. They are just decent sacrifices. Nothing wrong with that-- but it's not the same as a "brilliancy".

Avatar of alphaous

Absolute facts, the brilliant move definition has never sat right for me, either old or new, and I feel like the devs could definitely coook up something really good with a mixture of the two.

Avatar of JosephReidNZ

Danny, when will the Lessons and Puzzle Rush Survival leaderboard be fixed?

Avatar of Fire

why does chess.com think that they need to add 120+ bots and more every month? who really plays with all of them anyways

Avatar of Green_Sleeves
alphaous wrote:
654Psyfox wrote:

Why has chess.com not released any statements on the attack on Israel? Yall released this article supporting Ukraine on the onset of the war.

https://www.chess.com/article/view/on-the-invasion-of-ukraine

It's been nearly a month, and you all have still not released a sIdkatement, and continue to mute members who talk about it.

Seems like hypocrisy to me.

Idk, maybe it's cuz this situation is more complicated? I'm actually glad they haven't released a statement, knowing them it'd be an article blindly repeating a news outlet's opinion without full knowledge of the facts. This would require a lot more finesse than ukraine-russia (which was easier, not easy but not that hard to discuss maturely) and more people would get offended, the people here aren't mature enough for proper discussions of this matter especially because more people are less informed of this conflict than ukraine and russia.

I mean, when one side is officially recognized as a terrorist organization by multiple governments including the United States, that should simplify the issue really fast.

Avatar of alphaous

I am not going to get into this right now but thinking that this is simple is a quite ignorant take, if you reallly want to talk we can do it in personal chat.

Avatar of Green_Sleeves

I wasn’t saying it’s simple in actuality. This has become a super controversial issue. I only meant that it should be simple.

Avatar of alphaous

Even that is still stretching it, but I dont want to tallk politics (fear of lock or mute and I just remembered a question

Avatar of alphaous

Why did oyu make that rook gif Danny?

Avatar of wow

Why is you're forehead so big? Did you get plastic surgery to enlarge it?

Avatar of assassin3752

why are you cheating on your wife with the rook

Avatar of alphaous

Our efforts were in vain, and our pleas went unanswered

Avatar of sleepyporcyy

I hope Danny answered my questions, or else I'll be angy >:0

Avatar of alphaous

he didnt anwwer a single question from this thread

Avatar of SoupSailor
Danny did not answer any questions from this thread or the blog.
Avatar of JeremyCrowhurst
Green_Sleeves wrote:

I wasn’t saying it’s simple in actuality. This has become a super controversial issue. I only meant that it should be simple.

It would be simple if Israel stuck to attacking Hamas rather than killing women and children by the thousands. I would also say that I don't see this in any was as a political issue, rather, it's a legal issue. As in, the law of what is and is not a crime against humanity.

Avatar of Green_Sleeves
JeremyCrowhurst wrote:
Green_Sleeves wrote:

I wasn’t saying it’s simple in actuality. This has become a super controversial issue. I only meant that it should be simple.

It would be simple if Israel stuck to attacking Hamas rather than killing women and children by the thousands. I would also say that I don't see this in any was as a political issue, rather, it's a legal issue. As in, the law of what is and is not a crime against humanity.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-gaza-resident-says-hamas-preventing-evacuations-thousands-return-north/

tl;dr

Israel has been trying to get civilians out of harm’s way so that they can “stick to attacking Hamas,” but Hamas is actively keeping civilians from evacuating, “us[ing] Palestinian civilians as human shields” to quote President Biden.

Avatar of JeremyCrowhurst

Hey Danny, how come you never answered any questions? What did you put this up for?