Define Bad Chess player in terms of rating

Sort:
Avatar of cmbconcretefire

Title says it all. If you were to say a player is bad, what rating would you give them? 

Avatar of macer75
cmbconcretefire wrote:

Title says it all. If you were to say a player is bad, what rating would you give them? 

Um... I'm pretty sure it works the other way around.

Avatar of cmbconcretefire

Love it when people don't answer the question. 

Avatar of kamuimaru

a rating as abysmal as mine

Avatar of pentiumjs

Hi cmbconcretefire--if you want to go by statistics alone, the average adult club player is around 1600.  So you could say anyone short of that is "below average."  Others might argue for 2200 as a cutoff, since that's the point when someone is assumed to have mastered the game.  Aside from that it's very much in the eye of the beholder.

Avatar of samtoyousir

Ahem-

A bad player, is, at any given time, is someone with a rating less than exactly 200 points below my current rating at any time. Thank you. 

Avatar of Casual_Joe

On chess.com it'd be anything lower than 1200 since you get a 1200 just for having a pulse and an IP address.

Avatar of kamuimaru

on chesscube im at 1400 as opposed to my chess.com rating of 1100ish. so 1500 as chesscube's default rate would still be on the low end

Avatar of varelse1

One point less than whatever my rating happens to be at the time!

Avatar of ilikecapablanca
cmbconcretefire wrote:

Love it when people don't answer the question. 

OK. Everybody, don't answer the question!

Avatar of ilikecapablanca
harryz wrote:

1200

Ha.Ha. You know, I would think that you might have, maybe, gotten over it... I dunno. 

Avatar of ilikecapablanca
please_let_me_win wrote:

everything is relative. a 1200 is bad compared to a 1500, a 1500 is bad compared to an 1800, an 1800 is bad compared to a 2100, etc

What? A rating does not define their playing strength.

Avatar of ilikecapablanca

I see. You obviously didn't! My highest rating is, actually, 1275. How grand. 

(P.S Don't even try to edit your post.)

Avatar of ilikecapablanca

Ah. Thanks. Here: 

Online Chess

1200

Chess960

865

Tactics

1154

Chess Mentor

1581
Avatar of ilikecapablanca

Oh, wow. You don't even look at the people that you accuse.Tracking turned off!

Avatar of Grinmaster

I think this is an interesting question.  While I'm a mediocre player, I'm still good enough to beat all of my friends and family.  Isn't that the most important thing?

Avatar of Twinchicky

I'm not sure. I think it largely depends on where you live - At my chess club in middle-of-nowhere small-town Colorado, there's a rated 1700 who is the one guy that nobody can beat. I still consider myself as being absolutely horrible at chess, especially in comparison to the HUGE online community, but compared to the people in my club I'm at least half-okay.

Avatar of cmbconcretefire

Thank you to the people who answered the question. I just wanted to get a feel for how bad I suck at this game. For as many years as I have played and liked the game, I have come to the conclusion that I either need to study really hard just to become average... or just accept that I'm not very good at it. Lol. Oh well, I do enjoy the daily puzzles and I enjoy this site a lot. So that's good. 

Avatar of Bad_Blunderer

Well, then there are those who choose to play against much lower rated players, pushing them down further. What's up with those heroes?

Coming from a serial loser with an ever declining rating. 

Chess.com needs a Beginners' Corner!

Avatar of EvgeniyZh

Oh, come on. You rating doesn't depend on your opponents, only on you