So should they include Judit Polgar?
Well first of all, Naka definitely should include her. Because his audience is both stupid and sympathetic towards such things.
But putting Hiakru's inadequacies aside, and ranking in pure logical terms, is Judit legendary?
Yes, she's statistically amazing... and even if you don't agree with the maths side of it, you're unable to name a better female chess player in the past 10,000 years... therefore she's amazing whether you're an ignorant fool or not.
Women Chess is a proper subset of Chess so no, in the overall scheme of things she doesn't have legendary material in the latter one.
Well, even if you think women and men are exactly the same (they clearly aren't... and I don't mean that as a value judgement) it's clear that Judit's social impact is different than any of her peers (peers in terms of FIDE rating only).
Therefore there is something special about her and we can argue for a higher ranking.
The same way Anand is obviously not as good as Kasparov, but we can say he's great based on criteria other than FIDE rating and titles.
I don't think women are the same as men but some people want to have their cake and eat it as well, regardless, I don't see why this should be a criteria to be in the list.
On another note, wasn't this list about chess skill and your critique was on the consideration of things as vague or subjective as popularity or impact?
The fact of the matter is, it is made reasonably clear in the video they give her her rank due to her impact, and perhaps it is an impact that goes way beyond chess -if you look at the work of Ada Lovelace, it is vastly beyond many mathematicians, even discrete mathematicians; but still 170 years later young women are told technical subjects are not for them. (I admit Newton may be more important, but read his work on the calculus back to back with hers, his work is manifestly more easy to understand to the layman than her work. <I do kind of assume people have a knowledge of both calculus and discrete mathematics......if not, what the heck are you doing here you insects?>)
So it is indeed a partial judgement? Ok, great news. On another note, yes I do happen to know calculus and discrete maths given I'm a math undergrad but that's pretty irrelevant...
If people can remember the russian dude that decided "nah I won't fire the nuclear missile from my submarine" during the cold war, then they will definitly remember nakamura.
Oh, that must be one of those things you just learned in school recently.
Don't worry. You'll forget it in a few years (I have no idea what his name is.)
Just like the chess world will forget Nakamura.
I didn't learn it in school. I learned it from the internet.