do i really need to be spending 5 hours a day on chess in order to improve

Sort:
Avatar of krazeechess

i mean come on thats a ton of time and i have a lot of others things to do too. don't get me wrong, i like chess and am serious about it (i want to improve) but 5 hours just seems too long.

Avatar of krazeechess

and yes its summer right now for me so no school but still

Avatar of DasBurner

I spend like 15 minutes here and there tbh but I'm the same level as you so...

Avatar of meowmeomeo

"Work smart and hard, but value the 'smart' more."

Avatar of krazeechess
DaBabysBurner wrote:

I spend like 15 minutes here and there tbh but I'm the same level as you so...

its so hard to increase rating when u only play G30

Avatar of DasBurner
krazeechess wrote:
DaBabysBurner wrote:

I spend like 15 minutes here and there tbh but I'm the same level as you so...

its so hard to increase rating when u only play G30

me who's undefeated in lichess classical hehe

Avatar of SparkFight

just 1 hour is enough lol

Avatar of SparkFight

u should make a forum how to spot tactics in games, if you learn that ur uscf would be better

 

Avatar of krazeechess
royalknight101 wrote:

i mean carlsen studies for 8 hours i think and fischer longer

well yea hes world champion so ofc he does but thats his job so he should be putting the time into it

Avatar of krazeechess
Batman2508 wrote:

just 1 hour is enough lol

i think thats a bit of a low-ball, i know ppl who only spend one hour a day and so they are stuck at a rating of 900. i guess ur a bit of an exception

Avatar of krazeechess
Batman2508 wrote:

u should make a forum how to spot tactics in games, if you learn that ur uscf would be better

 

its not rly about my rating, its more about how i can study more efficiently and if people really need to spend so long to improve (on one of my other forums ppl said u gotta put 8 hours a day into chess which is insanity)

plus, i feel like if i don't spend at least 4 hours playing chess im not doing enough for the day

Avatar of krazeechess
meowmeomeo wrote:

"Work smart and hard, but value the 'smart' more."

example?

Avatar of meowmeomeo
meowmeomeo wrote:

"Work smart and hard, but value the 'smart' more."

Don't go playing chess like playing bullet or do puzzle battles. That's not smart. What I mean in 'smart' is you should play classical games or solve hard puzzles or sit at a corner reading books, that's the way to improve

Avatar of sndeww

Answer: no

Avatar of krazeechess
meowmeomeo wrote:
meowmeomeo wrote:

"Work smart and hard, but value the 'smart' more."

Don't go playing chess like playing bullet or do puzzle battles. That's not smart. What I mean in 'smart' is you should play classical games or solve hard puzzles or sit at a corner reading books, that's the way to improve

i play classical games, solve many hard puzzles (my puzzle rating is proof), but i don't read chess books very much

Avatar of meowmeomeo

You can try spending an hour solving compositions... 2 hour playing rapid/blitz games... another hour reading a chapter of a good book... And I think it's enough.

Avatar of drmrboss
krazeechess wrote:
DaBabysBurner wrote:

I spend like 15 minutes here and there tbh but I'm the same level as you so...

its so hard to increase rating when u only play G30

Dont play G30 much. 

Go play 3- 10 mins pace.

You need thousands of games experience to play toe to toe against 2000+.

Avatar of meowmeomeo
krazeechess wrote:
meowmeomeo wrote:
meowmeomeo wrote:

"Work smart and hard, but value the 'smart' more."

Don't go playing chess like playing bullet or do puzzle battles. That's not smart. What I mean in 'smart' is you should play classical games or solve hard puzzles or sit at a corner reading books, that's the way to improve

i play classical games, solve many hard puzzles (my puzzle rating is proof), but i don't read chess books very much

Yeah, but those puzzles aren't really as hard as 'compositions'. 

Avatar of krazeechess
meowmeomeo wrote:
krazeechess wrote:
meowmeomeo wrote:
meowmeomeo wrote:

"Work smart and hard, but value the 'smart' more."

Don't go playing chess like playing bullet or do puzzle battles. That's not smart. What I mean in 'smart' is you should play classical games or solve hard puzzles or sit at a corner reading books, that's the way to improve

i play classical games, solve many hard puzzles (my puzzle rating is proof), but i don't read chess books very much

Yeah, but those puzzles aren't really as hard as 'compositions'. 

yea i guess

Avatar of krazeechess
drmrboss wrote:
krazeechess wrote:
DaBabysBurner wrote:

I spend like 15 minutes here and there tbh but I'm the same level as you so...

its so hard to increase rating when u only play G30

Dont play G30 much. 

Go play 3- 10 mins pace.

You need thousands of games experience to play toe to toe against 2000+.

alright then, i will start reading my pawn structures book