Do you think I can reach 1000 rapid?

Sort:
RoadOcean
Can I reach 1000 rapid by the end of the year?
justbefair
RoadOcean wrote:
Can I reach 1000 rapid by the end of the year?

Nobody knows. It depends on how much time and effort you put into playing and studying.

Do you thoroughly review all the games that you lose?

You evidently like to play the Englund Gambit. You have sacrificed a pawn to get a lead in development.

When you get to a position like this, do you start to worry about anything?

 

Do you remember what happened after this point? Why did it happen?

Your rating is currently 783. It is moving in the right direction.

Good luck.

Evanman17
You can, just put in the effort and you got it
RoadOcean
I don’t usually review my games but I think I will start

Thanks for the luck I will definitely try since I have a chance (for a while I was stuck at 730
punchdrunkpatzer
RoadOcean wrote:
Can I reach 1000 rapid by the end of the year?

Yes.

Mazetoskylo

1000 rapid is beginner's level, so if you cannot reach it you may start wondering if chess isn't your thing.

And yes, you should always review your played games (all of them. It's the only way to avoid making the same mistakes again, again and again.

medelpad
Yes
O-O

Don't listen to @bobby_max, I am sure anyone with an actual brain can achieve a rating of 1000.

Thatguy-1
It’s weird, on cc I am 800 but in lichess I am 1300
Thatguy-1
Maybe try playing some games in there to see how you do
xtreme2020
#10 that’s normal lichess ratings are much more inflated. A lichess 1300 is about as good as an 800 chess.com,
Kakashi4343
Mazetoskylo wrote:

1000 rapid is beginner's level, so if you cannot reach it you may start wondering if chess isn't your thing.

And yes, you should always review your played games (all of them. It's the only way to avoid making the same mistakes again, again and again.

I get you, but understand a lot of people aren't playing for rating, just chess. They play for enjoyment only and aren't in it for the points at all and careless about losing.. To some its a game only..

Mazetoskylo
Kakashi4343 wrote:
Mazetoskylo wrote:

1000 rapid is beginner's level, so if you cannot reach it you may start wondering if chess isn't your thing.

And yes, you should always review your played games (all of them. It's the only way to avoid making the same mistakes again, again and again.

I get you, but understand a lot of people aren't playing for rating, just chess. They play for enjoyment only and aren't in it for the points at all and careless about losing.. To some its a game only..

It's absolutely fine, a game without fun isn't a game, after all. But in that case, why should someone care about his/her rating?

J-0K-ER

Why are people always asking what others think about them? It doesn't matter