Considering you supplied NONE of your own analysis, I have no idea what your thought process, ideas, plans ,etc .were.
Do you think I played defense well in this game?
Considering you supplied NONE of your own analysis, I have no idea what your thought process, ideas, plans ,etc .were.
I tried to comment my own game ,but when I open the board the pieces are missing and only the squares involved in a given move are highlighted (I don't know if someone else experienced this problem?). I always commentate my own games. I will try again a bit later.
Black's main problem was that he should've been attacking with his pawns in the lead, not his pieces. Once he played ... f4 he should've retreated the g6-knight so he could play ... g5 (followed by a general advance on that side).
I was actually quite afraid of this plan. Do you think white can defend well against such a pawn storm?
I recently played a 10|0 match with white pieces. Black's main weapon was some sort of attack on the kingside; my weapon was a counterattack on the queenside.
Do you think I defended + attacked well on the queenside, given my ELO? What should I have done better? Was black's attack as strong as it seemed at first? (possible sacrifices etc.)