W

Sort:
Avatar of Catrina-Volokitten

suppose you don't exist, then suddenly someone starts thinking about you. what happens then ?

Avatar of Catrina-Volokitten

chess exists as a part of the collective consciousness. chess boards and pieces and clocks also exist as inventions. but all this is elementary, isn't it Watson ?

Avatar of Lancelot325

Our mind and our body are strictly unified, and not separated. What our brain dictates through the nervous system, our body responds to and relates to.

The best way to lose self confidence is to start doubting about existance.

Avatar of Catrina-Volokitten

Are Trash_Aesthetic and Hatty-Freeham one and the same ?

Avatar of Trash_Aesthetic

descartes said how do we know we are not being deceived . id like to add we can be deceived by two things law or contract

Avatar of Trash_Aesthetic
Catrina-Volokitten wrote:

Are Trash_Aesthetic and Hatty_Freeham one and the same ?

No - neither physically nor spritually !!

Avatar of Trash_Aesthetic

unless we both dont exist then we are the same

Avatar of Catrina-Volokitten

that's your choice to be deceived I guess. but there's something weird about you "two".

Avatar of Trash_Aesthetic

but he is sayibng some completely ridiculous things about for example freud he knows nothign

Avatar of Trash_Aesthetic

I was educated at humboldt univ probably he some monkey european school

Avatar of Catrina-Volokitten

same ratings, both around for about a year and suddenly yapping your butts off about the same balony.

Avatar of Trash_Aesthetic

no because i want to prove him wrong all other posters are not serious...

probably he feels the same way although i cannot speak for him <3

Avatar of Catrina-Volokitten

fine then, I'm as unconvinced as I'll ever be.

Avatar of Trash_Aesthetic

and how knows you are not Hatty-Freeham? Catrina-Volokitten, Hatty-Freeham.... hmmmmmm

??

Avatar of The_Ghostess_Lola
Hatty-Freeham wrote:

This thread seems to have gotten out of control.

 

All i asked was whether chess exists

Don't even....Mad Hatty !

I am not gonna let you play simple now....you bugger.

Avatar of Catrina-Volokitten

If I remember rightly, MrHat also asked me what reality was! the noiyve!

Avatar of badger_song

This whole thread must be a clever joke...because the alternative is people are taking it seriously....

Avatar of ilikecapablanca
Murgen wrote:
ilikecapablanca wrote:
Murgen wrote:

Wrong! Uh-oh!!!

You fail everything forever (probably). Probably, but since nothing exists, who cares...

An unproven thing is unproven until proven. True.

It is not proven untrue until proven untrue. True.

Prove it untrue or have the weakness of your intellectual processes be assumed (while just an assumption... I'll be pretty confident my assumption is correct). By your own words have you bound yourself.

You'd better sit down. The power of awesome will knock you off your feet.

Your original argument is that chess exists. By your own words, this is, therefore unproven, which, by your own words, means that my statement is simultaneously true and untrue, which means that your statement that an unproven thing is unproven until proven is not proven is not proven, and therefore not true.

 

You opened the gate to ad hominem with your "The power of awesome..."

I'm not sure by what mechanism you can know what will or will not knock me off of my feet (other than being hit by a bus or raging bull etc.).

Ah, you see, that was not suggesting that your "threshold" of awesome was lacking somehow, and you are quite right that I have a long way to go to reach your threshold of awesome, but I find it easier to work with my threshold of awesome. 

Ya know, this would be much easier to do if we actually existed... 

Avatar of Apotek

Does chess exist? a) yes b) no c) maybe d) I don't know e) yes,but only in your mind f) It exists for as long as people exist g) It exists even if humans cease to exist  h)It exists for humans but not for aliens. i)It exists for both humans and aliens

Avatar of Johnny_Climaxus

if a yes we would have to know for sure to say it and we cant know anything for sure, so no. b if no the world wouldnt exist and thus we couldnt state it doesnt exist so no. c is correct. d is socrates old classical answer but modern school says its wrong because we can have true beliefs about something and they consider it somewhat knowledge. e no because definition of existence means absolute, universal, independent (not dependent on your mind) f. same problem g. same problem as "a" h. same problem as "e" i is saying the same thing as a, because if it were not, it would run into the same problem as h, not including universally, absolutely.

C (according to hyper-modern school), d according to classical school. But modern era we are in so C.

thanks for laying it out and being clear Apotek

Avatar of Guest7208409884
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.