Does one's playing style reflect one's personality?

I was watching Maurice Ashley on The Breakfast Club. He stated that one's personality determines one's play. 

Do you agree? Are aggressive people aggressive players. Passive people passive players? ect.

Personally, I can see it ringing somewhat true for myself. In chess, I like to go in for the attack or take risks, but only after I am castled, and my king is safe. 

I'm somewhat like that in life. I wouldn't take risks such as investments unless I am financially secure. 

I'm also cautious and tactical on the board and IRL.

Do you find this to be the case for you too?

Yes.  The one I'm skeptical about is the one about eye placement:

eyes wide, plays on the sides

eyes together, plays in the center

One of the games in The Queen's Gambit featured an extreme contrast in eye positioning between the players; I should try to figure out the game and see if it reflects this ditty.

I’m not sure what my play style is. Sometimes I like to go in for a long squeeze game of cat and mouse, other times I win in wild tactical complications, and yet other times I defend solidly for the entire game and break out at the end.

Yeah, I think that's true.

Style is a tricky thing (not everyone has one for different reasons), but I suspect he's simplifying the idea for the sake of communicating the message. It's true that chess can reflect things about your personality and character. Not only revealing parts of yourself to others, but also making you more aware of yourself. This isn't only for chess. I think any endeavor a person undertakes, tries hard, and works for many years, will have the same effect.

nah

But using myself as an example, I'm a circumspect sort of person. My ideal is something like getting all the facts, carefully considering them, and then going from there.

So when I was new to chess, I thought sacrificing and attacking is how children played, and mature grandmasters must play on a deeper level where you can have a better position even if to the casual observer it looks equal.

So I enjoyed studying things like strategy and endgames... of course I also solved tactic puzzles, but I didn't bother trying to learn anything about sacrificial mating attacks until I'd already been playing ~15 years. They simply didn't interest me.

In fact when I was still pretty new, I had one book, some title like "the art of sacrifice" or something, the back cover or the first sentence said something like "Chess players superficially admire Capablanca, but we all know our hearts burn with passion for Morphy and Tal" and I was so disgusted I put the book down right there and never picked it up again lol.

I have no style. Every opening I experimented with is for different styles. Giuoco Piano. Fried Liver Attack. Danish Gambit. Scotch Game. French Defense. I don't know if I will ever develop a style.

I just read a blog on the matter, made me think about my own personality:

https://www.chess.com/blog/batgirl/nothing-could-be-finer 

I play chess the same way i play board games, card games and its definitely a reflection of my personality. I don't like taking unnecessary risk unless I'm forced to do it.

You play different oppenings, doesn't necessarily mean you don't have a style. 

Do you play aggressive? Queen out early? Cautious? Favor pawn structure... Those are ideas of styles.