Don"t play with him/her - Chess Forums - Page 4

yedddy

Jul 6, 2014

0

#61

Wolfbird wrote:

yedddy wrote:

no, that's not it. i'm picturing a spikey haired couple at a softball game listening to mellisa ethridge, drinking coors light, talking about how they are going to play "find kevin" later on.

You imagine this while you're enjoying your lesbian porn?

that's how i picture batgirl. riding in the flat deck of a 87 chev burning bras and singing indigo girls.

yedddy

Jul 6, 2014

0

#62

Prudentia wrote:

I've found that most people who are willing to take shots at LGBT people are the ones who don't have a partner in life, or aren't able to keep one. There is a thread about lonely people playing chess. Perhaps, lonely people don't play chess, but rather, they go back to the same forums all the time to insult others without giving any useful contribution to the forums whatsoever.

seriously though, wasn't a shot a lgbt(more the femenist vibe).. just the image i am getting.. no malice intended.

Wolfbird

Jul 6, 2014

0

#63

You're trying to outwit a woman who is outwitting you and so you try to insult her by calling her a lesbian. Someone said you were living up to your avatar. I agree. Keep trying to grow that little peanut between your ears.

BoredToTears

Jul 6, 2014

0

#64

yedddy wrote:

seriously though, wasn't a shot a lgbt(more the femenist vibe).. just the image i am getting.. no malice intended.

Really? I don't buy it. This guy has to be trolling, at least now, if not the whole time. I feel like he has been too transparent about this in recent comments.

P.S. Batgirl, epic comment earlier.

netzach

Jul 6, 2014

0

#65

Is yedddy gay?

yedddy

Jul 6, 2014

0

#66

Wolfbird wrote:

You're trying to outwit a woman who is outwitting you and so you try to insult her by calling her a lesbian. Someone said you were living up to your avatar. I agree. Keep trying to grow that little peanut between your ears.

wow. talk about lonley people. here is wolfbird chiming in.

first off. there is nothing more beautiful than the love between a woman and another woman. but all you sackless computer nerds standing behind a bat girls misandry and bra burning propaganda are very subtly emasculating yourselfs.

secondly. that would have to be one hell of a stephanie hawkings to outwit these likes.

Wolfbird

Jul 6, 2014

0

#67

Yes, Homer.

yedddy

Jul 6, 2014

0

#68

owltuna wrote:

" This guy has to be trolling..."

No, he's just a tiresome, unfunny ass.

if only i were as interesting as owl tuna. then i could say the exact same things everyone else has already said and feel so smart and smug all at the same time, never realizing my whole life was just one big regurgitation.

ebanlague

Jul 6, 2014

0

#69

It's okay Homer. It's okay.

najdorf96

Jul 6, 2014

0

#70

Lol. What's funny, is watching an lonely nerd in his parent's basement posting incomprehensible jibber-jabber and hi-jacking this forum with regurgitated rhetoric of his own ta justify self-meaning in an conversation he doesn't fully understand or even has an relatable anecdote to tell.

Sad (yedddy).

8/

Prudentia

Jul 7, 2014

0

#71

It's important to remember that we shouldn't lower ourselves to insulting somebody, even if they insult us first, or want to push the envelope. Nobody can control what hurtful things anybody else wants to say, but we can control our own voices.

I_Am_Second

Jul 7, 2014

0

#72

Prudentia wrote:

It's important to remember that we shouldn't lower ourselves to insulting somebody, even if they insult us first, or want to push the envelope. Nobody can control what hurtful things anybody else wants to say, but we can control our own voices.

There is no such thing as a bad word. Its the context that it is used in, and us empowering it that makes it bad.

Syd_Arthur

Jul 7, 2014

0

#73

"Find Kevin"??? Is that a variation of the Abbazia/en passant quadruple rook sacrifice manoeuvre?

batgirl

Jul 7, 2014

0

#74

It's sometimes called SpraggettChess.

Irontiger

Jul 7, 2014

0

#75

XKCD stuff that was called for in the first few pages:

Prudentia

Jul 7, 2014

0

#76

Oh my god... CLASSIC!!

Syd_Arthur

Jul 7, 2014

0

#77

Sorry...i seem to have lost my way; could someone please direct me back to the discussion about TT problem #90874320786?

You know, the one where the solution is a tertiary knight pin with simultaneous en passant/queening coupled with an auto-spite check on one's own king?

SocialPanda

Jul 7, 2014

0

#78

Syd_Arthur: It was that thread when this discussion took place:

"How is this stupid problem rated 2784????"

"0:02 +14 Yay! 2000 Rating for the first time! "

"Who cares about your useless rating, stop bragging!"

"Please don´t comment, I´m tracking the comments to this problem and I have to return every 6 months to read your garbarge!"

"this is too difficult, Fischer didn´t find it, how can they expect that we find this in 10 seconds?"

"this was a simple skewer, you are a retard or something"

"dude, I have 400 more rating points in blitz than you!"

"lol"

"I have failed 23 problems today, I´m quitting chess"

?

ppandachess

Jul 7, 2014

0

#79

Irontiger wrote:

XKCD stuff that was called for in the first few pages:

That might be true, but a bit tough :)

http://enjoychesslearning.wordpress.com/

ppandachess

Jul 7, 2014

0

#80

netzach wrote:

Good people play chess with the pieces on the board.

Those of poor upbringing operate their mouths + vulgarity so report him. (or her)

Nice retro board :)

http://enjoychesslearning.wordpress.com/