I vote Morricone!

Thanks for the games Feufollet, you are a very worthy opponent. I enjoyed them, particularly the one where I was white.
LOL....hope you enjoyed it too...I was making my moves just to get the game over with, if you haven't noticed.
I play the game recreationally...and you were my recreation
I enjoyed that game (as white) because I sacked the exchange for very unclear compensation, if you hadn't noticed, and I know you did your best to win it. When you were trying to get the game over with, it was because you had retreated your king the wrong way and you were losing. I think you had to play g5, close your eyes and hope for the best, not c6. As white, you just folded but as black you fought so one of the games was enjoyable for me.
lmao...good thing you took the time to analyze what my intentions were because I sure wasn't even thinking about it! Maybe you should write a book about the game.
Feufollet vs Optimissed, Game Of The Century
LOL
I should be honoured that you not only challenged me to play but that you are so full of pride about beating me
given our difference in rankings....
Not the first time someone above 2000 challenged me to play....interesting!
I always lose though 
I make my moves between watching my stocks and designing websites, btw. And a slew of other things constantly needing my attention.
I don't challenge people... the challenge is more with myself when I play...can I improve my game in these conditions? - that is my training...because these will always be the conditions I find myself in..
So sorry bud, you winning or losing means little to me.
I suppose you must make a hobby of annoying stronger players. Actually, if you had any will to improve, you'd swallow your pride and go over the games with me. In particular, as white, you missed a very early tactic that would have held the positional balance but as it was it sort of became a colours reversed hypermodern opening where black had more than equalised. The other game was fascinating because it was one of those games where all the tactics that I thought I saw seemed to work, only to turn out to be flawed. So I sacrificed the exchange so get rid of your strong bishop, only to find that again, none of the tactics quite worked. There seemed to be no win by force but your development was lagging by about three moves. There were about seven different variations where I won your queen but in six of them you were still winning the game. When you played c6 you had a number of viable moves to choose from and unfortunately you chose a continuation that lost by force.
I made my moves in between putting together some auction lots and mending my car, as well as multifarious other jobs that had to be attended to. Of course my winning means nothing to you. If, on the other hand, you had managed so much as one draw, bud, I don't think we'd ever have heard the last of it.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
@ Optimissed - you are welcome to your opinions, even if they are appear bigoted and seem to stem from little more than superficial, stereotyped clichés, rather than genuine musical understanding. However, you made assertions (quite distinct from opinion) that should rightfully be challenged - I've asked you to provide specific examples of Mozart's music that is "simplistic", are you capable of substantiating these assertions? Perhaps you'd care to explain how the opening two bars of K475 are composed if it is so simple, and how it is treated in the following two bars? You also asserted that his music was written for unsophisticated people with little musical appreciation - again, please provide some specific musical examples that demonstrates this kind of dumbed-down pandering that you allege. I'm quite sure you won't be able to provide a single piece of music, even from his early years, that demonstrates the kind of "Muzak" that you accuse him of, because his music stands up to the most rigorous musical analysis. His music may not be to your taste, but to brazenly cast it in the light you have shows a certain level of ignorance on your part, in my opinion.
Perhaps you could get a portion of sheet music of one of Mozart's or Beethoven's most known paste it here without its title...see if he can "Name That Tune" - most classical musicians would be able to recognize it and then give some sort of analysis...
I just want to see if he can read sheet music...
It's not a full proof test, someone he knows who is a musician can still bail him out...but it's a try