elo estimate is a scam??

Sort:
Avatar of Jason6832

What is did was I got the pgn of a game played between magnus carlsen and another opponent. The Game review said that magnus had an elo estimate of around 3100 and the other opponent at around 2900. However, I copied that pgn, and pasted it into one of my own games i played and before I game reviewed it, i changed the name of players to something else. I also changed the elo the around 800. So, after all this, i clicked game review and when i reviewed this game played by two GM's it said their elo estimate was 1200 and 900. This is really weird.

Avatar of Blues
@ Jason6832 the elo estimate takes into consideration your own rating. Since magnus is much higher rated than you he gets the higher estimate.
Avatar of Jason6832

I'd also like to add, i have the same issue when accuracy. I've had some games that i played at 95+ accuracy. However, the elo estimate still thinks i'm around my rating. But when GM's play at 95+ accuracy, the elo estimate thinks they played like 2900+ elo. Someone please help me understand

Avatar of ThePersonAboveYou

i got 2200 estimate at 600

Avatar of ThePersonAboveYou

but it was a mediocre game, no blunder/mistake

Avatar of Jason6832
DaChessBlues wrote:
@ Jason6832 the elo estimate takes into consideration your own rating. Since magnus is much higher rated than you he gets the higher estimate.

ok. Thank's for clarifying

Avatar of Blues
You’re welcome!
Avatar of ThePersonAboveYou

my idea is that, chess.com takes into account that a 500 player would not know/calculate the same theory as a 2700, so if both players played the same move, chess.com will assume the 2700 put more knowledge into that move

Avatar of sndeww

yes, the rating estimate is a scam, congratulations, you have discovered common knowledge

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
Jason6832 wrote:

I'd also like to add, i have the same issue when accuracy. I've had some games that i played at 95+ accuracy. However, the elo estimate still thinks i'm around my rating. But when GM's play at 95+ accuracy, the elo estimate thinks they played like 2900+ elo. Someone please help me understand

Accuracy is influenced by rating. So, a game at your rating played but a lot higher rated player, isn't going to have the same accuracy. Basically, the algorithm is more forgiving at lower rating levels

https://support.chess.com/article/1135-what-is-accuracy-in-analysis-how-is-it-measured

Also, the estimated rating is just that, an estimate and is based on the player ratings and their accuracy to derive a value.

Avatar of Hacker_No_Fake

ước tính xếp hạng là lừa đảo

chúc mừng

Avatar of CleverZoe

Im 800 in daily and the game review estimated me at 2800 elo.