For the Elometer test, I got a rating of 2107. This seems accurate considering that my national OTB standard rating at the moment is roughly 2100.
Elometer

I agree with the NM there are too many trivial ones which aren't weighted as high and one loses interest over time. I found myself rushing through it around problem 55. I'm sure I lost 200 elo there. My score of 2039 is also ridiculously too high. I'm a 1600 player on like 3 different chess servers at blitz

The Elometer test gave me a result of 1679, and I just pseudorandomly clicked through half of them as a means of experiment. However, for the other portion, I did answer the tactical questions seriously. Intriguingly enough, my result of 1679 was higher than that encountered 2 months ago, and I don't believe I was too horrible at chess back relative to my current playing style (not that I have any expertise whatsoever). Anyhow, there is no way that an 850 rated player should be able to get 1679 by clicking through only half the options seriously.
Here is my elometer https://github.com/dendiod/elometer

Here's what I got. I wasn't aware that the test was timed, so I thought until I had a good candidate move. Had I known it was timed, I would have played faster.
This seems pretty darn inflated, given that my USCF rating hovers around 1800 or so. However, I have been studying a lot of tactics lately, so, who knows.
I prefer to think that I'm woefully underrated.
I got 1919. The clock on that thing was really annoying the hell out of me. I also don't actually think I'm anywhere close to 1919 skill level.
look at you being even higher now good job

I got 1919. The clock on that thing was really annoying the hell out of me. I also don't actually think I'm anywhere close to 1919 skill level.
That changed
My USCF rating is 1131 and it gave me an 1836