hmmm ... for me the en passant rule is a weapon to be use by black. i usually will hope my opponent will en passant and give me a tactical advantages.
bwahahahaha...
hmmm ... for me the en passant rule is a weapon to be use by black. i usually will hope my opponent will en passant and give me a tactical advantages.
bwahahahaha...
I myself was un aware of what the en passant rule was... for more information you can check this link that I found..
http://www.chessvariants.org/d.chess/enpassant.html
Interesting move.
You say you've used it before and it was awseome =o) haha, was it beneficial to your strategy or just fun to do?
I myself was un aware of what the en passant rule was... for more information you can check this link that I found..
http://www.chessvariants.org/d.chess/enpassant.html
Interesting move.
You say you've used it before and it was awseome =o) haha, was it beneficial to your strategy or just fun to do?
Both :D
I'm curious. I think that the en passant rule is totally awesome and if feels incredible to use it in a game. I have used it twice since getting on chess.com. Does anybody feel the same way?
I thought the en passant was less that of royality.. go figure.. ![]()

Zugzwang:
A German word meaning obligation to move. The term is used for a position in which whoever has the move would obtain a worse result than if it were the opponent’s turn to play. The term was first used in a German chess magazine in 1858
Thanks very much all of you who replied! 
En Passant - "in passing"
I usually find this to be a move I like to be played against me, like comel444said, it can give you tactical advantage, opening paths.
I believe I can use en passant but am unsure how to move the piece in chess.com.
I have tried but it doesnt seem to be taking it, but I am sure it is an en passant move.
What am I doing wrong?
My apologies to all!
Thanks to another poster, I have realised my mistake, and the situation is not en passant.
Sorry for wasting any of your time.
Cheers
When I am teaching chess, I always tell my friends that if you do not include en passant it is not chess. Without en passant a huge body of endgame theory is useless.
That said, when I was rated near 1400 I beat someone who was rated 2002 due to en passant giving me a passed pawn on F3 around move 20. This was OTB. :D
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
I'm curious. I think that the en passant rule is totally awesome and if feels incredible to use it in a game. I have used it twice since getting on chess.com. Does anybody feel the same way?