in first game, Black just misses the back rank mate threat. with 18......g6 Black is fine.
in second game, unfortunately 6 e5 is a mistake. Black wins that pawn with 6.....Qa5+
u do get maximum power from your 2 Bs and Rs, as his King is pummeled, while his Rs are out of the game and his B with pawns can not defend him. Well done !
So here I was battling a 1400+ enemy and I lost the first game, annoyed at this because I knew I had the power to sort him out, I decided to give him a rematch, and he decided to accept, angry about how he beat me the first time, in the rematch, he starts going on about how I need to read chess instructions/manuals and how I don't know how to play chess, this further sending me into a rage, I decided to just stop holding back and go full force on him, now looking at the final position, I did not calculate any of this at any point in time, it just sort of ended up luckily in my favor, could anyone be so kind as to tell me how well I played in the rematch where I won, and also what mistakes I am making in the first match? He was a good opponent and I'm glad he said what he said, I just wasn't at the time, but I guess that is what led to me getting angry and pulling off a win, let me know what you think!
Here are the two games! -- Enjoy! -- Thanks for your time!
This one I lost sadly =(
But after this I decided I am going to win and got angry, he then made the mistake of telling me how I play was not good chess and that I need to learn, so I cranked up the heat and won, I then asked what was that about me not playing good chess?
Can anyone tell me if being materialistic like this is okay? Or what this type of play is called? Thanks!
Here is the second game! (Notice how all the pieces just happen to line up WITH NO CALCULATION -- it just happens to line up!)