I'm desperate here. I pay a fee that I'm consistently unable to play on. I'm a loyal mber that's stopped me from playing. Can anyone recommend a site that doent lock out members. And how do I reclaim my subscription. This needs to be passed on to all members. I'd leave this if it was for free.
FIX! YOUR! SERVERS!

chill, its just one game. you would do better studying chess instead of complaining =P
Says the non-paying "member"
Registration is free, and I don't see why there should be any elitism from the premium members to the non-premium members. And there are other places than chess.com where you can play chess, as well as books for chess study. Not to mention that elo points can be earned back - if you're 1400 elo, even if you get dropped to 1200 you will earn the 200 points back.
It's not elitism. It's me saying that someone who plays for free shouldn't be telling me to chill about being frustrated with the service. Completely reasonable.

I'm desperate here. I pay a fee that I'm consistently unable to play on. I'm a loyal mber that's stopped me from playing. Can anyone recommend a site that doent lock out members. And how do I reclaim my subscription. This needs to be passed on to all members. I'd leave this if it was for free.
Lichess.org is free and has servers that work
I'm desperate here. I pay a fee that I'm consistently unable to play on. I'm a loyal mber that's stopped me from playing. Can anyone recommend a site that doent lock out members. And how do I reclaim my subscription. This needs to be passed on to all members. I'd leave this if it was for free.
Lichess.org is free and has servers that work
Most of the time, though they have had a few glitches as well.

My entire point with this thread is that paying customers are not getting what they pay for. It shouldn't create an argument amongst users.
Guys, let's all save 4 player chess . Please support me in the mission.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/fix-your-servers-2?newCommentCount=1&page=3#comment-81281629

This all started as soon as chess.com gobbled up all the Play Magnus brand sites. They spread themselves too thin and are now scrambling.
My entire point with this thread is that paying customers are not getting what they pay for. It shouldn't create an argument amongst users.
Agreed. They really need to figure this out. I know that if things are still like this when the time comes, I will not be renewing my subscription.

My entire point with this thread is that paying customers are not getting what they pay for. It shouldn't create an argument amongst users.
Agreed. They really need to figure this out. I know that if things are still like this when the time comes, I will not be renewing my subscription.
I agree. And I'm tired of these troll types telling me to shut up.
My entire point with this thread is that paying customers are not getting what they pay for. It shouldn't create an argument amongst users.
Agreed. They really need to figure this out. I know that if things are still like this when the time comes, I will not be renewing my subscription.
And I disagree; Users who don't pay also bring money to chess.com.
How do you think the price of an advert is negociated? It's the number of users that sets the ground for the price of the adverts.
Other factors are also taken into account, like how much time one spends on the site once connected: long time equals more value.
Possibly, free users bring, by the use of their time, more money to chess.com than pay members.
Hey, that's all great but they will lose my subscriber $ if this keeps up. Whether that matters at all in the grand scheme of things is another issue entirely. Not really my concern.


This is not meant as a paying vs. non-paying membership discussion. As a paying member, when you're not getting the services that are part of that membership, then it is completely reasonable to be pissed off with chess.com
What I'm saying, is that you don't need to discard non-paying members in the concerns for servers issues.
And maybe I do hint you, it's not really gracefull to pose as some sort of superior beings for the reason you decided to spend money on something you can get for free.
You are seriously over-interpreting! LOL.

What I'm saying, is that you don't need to discard non-paying members in the concerns for servers issues.
And maybe I do hint you, it's not really gracefull to pose as some sort of superior beings for the reason you decided to spend money on something you can get for free.
You are seriously over-interpreting! LOL.
How did some interpret this as being some sort of insult to non-paying members? It has nothing to do with that.

chill, its just one game. you would do better studying chess instead of complaining =P
Says the non-paying "member"
Registration is free, and I don't see why there should be any elitism from the premium members to the non-premium members. And there are other places than chess.com where you can play chess, as well as books for chess study. Not to mention that elo points can be earned back - if you're 1400 elo, even if you get dropped to 1200 you will earn the 200 points back.